ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2021
Perception of quality of intraoperative fluoroscopy and the influence on postoperative management: an international survey.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntraoperative precise visualization of fractures and assessment of the quality of reduction is essential in orthopedic trauma surgery. Fluoroscopic skills will lead to an increased detection rate of minimal abnormalities needing revision intraoperatively. The definition of fluoroscopic skills and the interpretation of acceptable "minimal abnormalities" remains somehow unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the subjective quality assessment of intraoperative radiographs (IR) and whether they are influenced by cultural and demographic factors. Furthermore, we aimed to answer the question whether the indication for revision surgery is international comparable or rather influenceable by cultural aspects.
methodsIntraoperative radiographs of 30 patients operated for an ankle or radius fracture were selected for an international survey. In total, 22 patients were randomly selected from an already existing database and eligible for inclusion if reduction was accomplished during initial operation without planed revision. Eight patients of this group had undergone an unplanned revision surgery (26.6%). Fifteen orthopedic trauma surgeons from three different countries answered this survey. All raters were senior consultants.
resultsThe quality of reduction was rated as good in both the AP (7.95 of 10) and lateral (7.84 of 10) views. The inter-observer reliability was substantially weaker in Country B (kappa of 0.23) compared to Countries A (p value < 0.05) and C (range 0.33-0.43). In only 33% of the cases the raters requested a postoperative radiograph. This was significantly fewer (p value < 0.001) in Country A. The frequency of postoperative requested CT's was comparable between the countries.
conclusionThis study showed acceptable IR assessment in terms of quality rating. Furthermore, it revealed substantial differences in the postoperative decision-making process in different countries, especially regarding the necessity for postoperative radiographs. This suggests that definition for indication of revision surgery is culturally influenced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31863134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.