Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31863076›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2020

A workflow for generating multi-strain genome-scale metabolic models of prokaryotes.

Charles J Norsigian, Xin Fang, Yara Seif, Jonathan M Monk, Bernhard O Palsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multi-strain analysis ofmSystems · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring the IS-capades ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  7. Predicting Strain-Specific Metabolic Capabilities in the GenusComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  8. Multi-strain Analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charles J Norsigian *Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Xin Fang *Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Yara SeifDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8813-5679
Jonathan M MonkDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Bernhard O PalssonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. palsson@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2357-6785

Funding

Systems Biology Approach to Redefine Susceptibility Testing and Treatment of MDR Pathogens in the Context of Host ImmunityU01AI124316 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PALSSON, BERNHARD O · 2016 to 2020
$10.2M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI124316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-scale models (GEMs) of bacterial strains' metabolism have been formulated and used over the past 20 years. Recently, with the number of genome sequences exponentially increasing, multi-strain GEMs have proved valuable to define the properties of a species. Here, through four major stages, we extend the original Protocol used to generate a GEM for a single strain to enable multi-strain GEMs: (i) obtain or generate a high-quality model of a reference strain; (ii) compare the genome sequence between a reference strain and target strains to generate a homology matrix; (iii) generate draft strain-specific models from the homology matrix; and (iv) manually curate draft models. These multi-strain GEMs can be used to study pan-metabolic capabilities and strain-specific differences across a species, thus providing insights into its range of lifestyles. Unlike the original Protocol, this procedure is scalable and can be partly automated with the Supplementary Jupyter notebook Tutorial. This Protocol Extension joins the ranks of other comparable methods for generating models such as CarveMe and KBase. This extension of the original Protocol takes on the order of weeks to multiple months to complete depending on the availability of a suitable reference model.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalWorkflowGenomicsMetabolomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationProkaryotic CellsSequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31863076
PMCPMC7017905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.