Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31862896›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Neural correlates of tactile simultaneity judgement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Takahiro Kimura, Hiroshi Kadota, Tsuyoshi Kuroda, Tomomi D Funai, Makoto Iwata, Takanori Kochiyama, Makoto Miyazaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Temporal Scaffolding of Sensory Organization.Annual review of psychology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Takahiro KimuraInstitute of Liberal Arts and Science, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa-shi, Ishikawa, 920-1192, Japan. kimura@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3808-3337
Hiroshi KadotaResearch Institute, Kochi University of Technology, 185 Miyanokuchi, Tosayamada, Kami-shi, Kochi, 782-8502, Japan.
Tsuyoshi KurodaFaculty of Informatics, Shizuoka University, 3-5-1 Johoku Naka-ku, Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, 432-8011, Japan.
Tomomi D FunaiResearch Institute of Time Study, Yamaguchi University, 1677-1 Yoshida, Yamaguchi, 753-8511, Japan.
Makoto IwataResearch Institute, Kochi University of Technology, 185 Miyanokuchi, Tosayamada, Kami-shi, Kochi, 782-8502, Japan.
Takanori KochiyamaATR Brain Activity Imaging Center, 2-2-2 Hikaridai Seika-cho, Sorakugun, Kyoto, 619-0288, Japan.
Makoto MiyazakiFaculty of Informatics, Shizuoka University, 3-5-1 Johoku Naka-ku, Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, 432-8011, Japan. miyazaki-makoto@inf.shizuoka.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simultaneity judgement (SJ) is a temporal discrimination task in which the targets span an ultimately short time range (zero or not). Psychophysical studies suggest that SJ is adequate to probe the perceptual components of human time processing in pure form. Thus far, time-relevant neural correlates for tactile SJ are unclear. We performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the neural correlates of tactile SJ using tactile number judgement as a time-irrelevant control task. As our main result, we demonstrated that the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL) is an SJ-specific region. The right IPL was detected by both parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses, and its activation intensity fulfilled a strict statistical criterion. In addition, we observed that some left-dominant regions (e.g., the striatum) were specifically activated by successive stimuli during SJ. Meanwhile, no region was specifically activated by simultaneous stimuli during SJ. Accordingly, we infer that the neural process for tactile SJ is as follows: the striatum estimates the time interval between tactile stimuli; based on this interval, the right IPL discriminates the successiveness or simultaneity of the stimuli. Moreover, taking detailed behavioural results into account, we further discuss possible concurrent or alternative mechanisms that can explain the fMRI results.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhotic StimulationReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID31862896
PMCPMC6925270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.