Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31862874›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

The METLIN small molecule dataset for machine learning-based retention time prediction.

Xavier Domingo-Almenara, Carlos Guijas, Elizabeth Billings, J Rafael Montenegro-Burke, Winnie Uritboonthai, Aries E Aisporna, Emily Chen, H Paul Benton, Gary Siuzdak

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. FastRet: Fast and Simple Retention Time Prediction in Liquid Chromatography.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xavier Domingo-AlmenaraScripps Center for Metabolomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA. xavier.domingoa@eurecat.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0133-6863
Carlos GuijasScripps Center for Metabolomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Elizabeth BillingsScripps Center for Metabolomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4320-3276
J Rafael Montenegro-BurkeScripps Center for Metabolomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7787-3414
Winnie UritboonthaiScripps Center for Metabolomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Aries E AispornaScripps Center for Metabolomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Emily ChenCalifornia Institute for Biomedical Research (Calibr), The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
H Paul BentonScripps Center for Metabolomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4248-2269
Gary SiuzdakScripps Center for Metabolomics, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA. siuzdak@scripps.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4749-0014

Funding

Therapeutics Core (Page 286)P30MH062261 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GENDELMAN, HOWARD E · 2000 to 2021
$37.7M
Metabolomics Technologies to Advance Biomedical ResearchR35GM130385 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI GARY E SIUZDAK · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
Proteomic Strategies for AIDS and Drug Abuse - HIV and METH CNS SynergyP01DA026146 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GENDELMAN, HOWARD E · 2008 to 2010
$2.9M
Mummichog 3, aligning mass spectrometry data to biological networks - Neutral LossU01CA235493 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI LI, SHUZHAO, SIUZDAK, GARY E · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA235493NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA026146NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130385NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning has been extensively applied in small molecule analysis to predict a wide range of molecular properties and processes including mass spectrometry fragmentation or chromatographic retention time. However, current approaches for retention time prediction lack sufficient accuracy due to limited available experimental data. Here we introduce the METLIN small molecule retention time (SMRT) dataset, an experimentally acquired reverse-phase chromatography retention time dataset covering up to 80,038 small molecules. To demonstrate the utility of this dataset, we deployed a deep learning model for retention time prediction applied to small molecule annotation. Results showed that in 70[Formula: see text] of the cases, the correct molecular identity was ranked among the top 3 candidates based on their predicted retention time. We anticipate that this dataset will enable the community to apply machine learning or first principles strategies to generate better models for retention time prediction.

Indexed as

Chromatography, Reverse-PhaseDeep LearningMass SpectrometryModels, ChemicalDatasets as TopicSmall Molecule LibrariesTime FactorsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID31862874
PMCPMC6925099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.