Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31862856›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Categorical Biases in Human Occipitoparietal Cortex.

Edward F Ester, Thomas C Sprague, John T Serences

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Attention Alters Population Spatial Frequency Tuning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Category Learning Selectively Enhances Representations of Boundary-Adjacent Exemplars in Early Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Quantifying Bias in Hierarchical Category Systems.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edward F EsterDepartment of Psychology, Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, and FAU Brain Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida 33431, eester@fau.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1372-8768
Thomas C SpragueDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, and.ORCID 0000-0001-9530-2463
John T SerencesDepartment of Psychology, Neurosciences Graduate Program, and Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, California 92093.ORCID 0000-0002-8551-5147
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USFlorida Atlantic University · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Adaptive population codes for flexible visually-guided behaviorsR01EY025872 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI John T Serences · 2016 to 2026
$4.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Categorization allows organisms to generalize existing knowledge to novel stimuli and to discriminate between physically similar yet conceptually different stimuli. Humans, nonhuman primates, and rodents can readily learn arbitrary categories defined by low-level visual features, and learning distorts perceptual sensitivity for category-defining features such that differences between physically similar yet categorically distinct exemplars are enhanced, whereas differences between equally similar but categorically identical stimuli are reduced. We report a possible basis for these distortions in human occipitoparietal cortex. In three experiments, we used an inverted encoding model to recover population-level representations of stimuli from multivoxel and multielectrode patterns of human brain activity while human participants (both sexes) classified continuous stimulus sets into discrete groups. In each experiment, reconstructed representations of to-be-categorized stimuli were systematically biased toward the center of the appropriate category. These biases were largest for exemplars near a category boundary, predicted participants' overt category judgments, emerged shortly after stimulus onset, and could not be explained by mechanisms of response selection or motor preparation. Collectively, our findings suggest that category learning can influence processing at the earliest stages of cortical visual processing.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCognitionElectroencephalographyFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOccipital LobeParietal LobePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationcategorizationEEGfMRIhumanoccipital cortex

Identifiers

PMID31862856
PMCPMC6975303
OpenAlexW2994987564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.