Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31862786›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020

Simulation-Based Evaluation of Three Methods for Local Ancestry Deconvolution of Non-model Crop Species Genomes.

Aurélien Cottin, Benjamin Penaud, Jean-Christophe Glaszmann, Nabila Yahiaoui, Mathieu Gautier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. GeMo: a web-based platform for the visualization and curation of genome ancestry mosaics.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aurélien CottinCIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0862-784X
Benjamin PenaudCIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8881-9253
Jean-Christophe GlaszmannCIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
Nabila YahiaouiCIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398 Montpellier, France, mathieu.gautier@inra.fr nabila.yahiaoui@cirad.fr.
Mathieu GautierINRAE, UMR CBGP, F-34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez Cedex, France mathieu.gautier@inra.fr nabila.yahiaoui@cirad.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridizations between species and subspecies represented major steps in the history of many crop species. Such events generally lead to genomes with mosaic patterns of chromosomal segments of various origins that may be assessed by local ancestry inference methods. However, these methods have mainly been developed in the context of human population genetics with implicit assumptions that may not always fit plant models. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of three state-of-the-art inference methods (SABER, ELAI and WINPOP) for local ancestry inference under scenarios that can be encountered in plant species. For this, we developed an R package to simulate genotyping data under such scenarios. The tested inference methods performed similarly well as far as representatives of source populations were available. As expected, the higher the level of differentiation between ancestral source populations and the lower the number of generations since admixture, the more accurate were the results. Interestingly, the accuracy of the methods was only marginally affected by i) the number of ancestries (up to six tested); ii) the sample design (

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, PlantGenomicsAlgorithmsCrops, AgriculturalHumansModels, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareadmixturecropslocal ancestry inferencesimulation analysis

Identifiers

PMID31862786
PMCPMC7003078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.