Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31862615›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2020

Cell guidance ligands, receptors and complexes - orchestrating signalling in time and space.

Daniel Rozbesky, Edith Yvonne Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nurr1 Orchestrates Claustrum Development and Functionality.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mechanisms of endothelial flow sensing.Nature cardiovascular research · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Dynamic Effects in Nucleation of Receptor Clusters.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel RozbeskyDivision of Structural Biology, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7BN, United Kingdom.
Edith Yvonne JonesDivision of Structural Biology, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7BN, United Kingdom. Electronic address: yvonne@strubi.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17721Cancer Research UK C375/A17721Medical Research Council MR/M000141/1Medical Research Council MR/T000503/1Wellcome Trust 203141/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of four cell guidance molecule families (the netrins, slits, ephrins and semaphorins) interact with their cognate cell surface receptors to guide cells during development and maintain tissue homeostasis. Integrated structure and cell-based analyses are providing insight into the mechanisms by which these signalling systems can deliver myriad outcomes that require exquisite accuracy in timing and location. Here we review recent advances in our understanding of the roles of oligomeric states, auto-inhibition, signalling assembly size and composition in cell guidance cue function.

Indexed as

LigandsSignal TransductionAnimalsBiomarkersCell Adhesion MoleculesEphrinsHumansMacromolecular SubstancesNerve Tissue ProteinsProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein MultimerizationReceptors, Cell SurfaceSemaphorinsBiomarkersCell Adhesion MoleculesEphrinsLigandsMacromolecular SubstancesNerve Tissue ProteinsplexinReceptors, Cell SurfaceSemaphorins

Identifiers

PMID31862615
PMCPMC7171467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.