Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31862445›Full record

SynthesisSleep medicine reviews2020

Many naps, one nap, none: A systematic review and meta-analysis of napping patterns in children 0-12 years.

Sally Staton, Peter S Rankin, Mollie Harding, Simon S Smith, Emily Westwood, Monique K LeBourgeois, Karen J Thorpe

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sleep medicine reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sleep Across the Lifespan: A Neurobehavioral Perspective.Current sleep medicine reports · 2025
    Review
  17. Insufficient Sleep Syndrome in Childhood.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Daytime sleep duration during infancy as an indicator for cognitive development at school age: a prospective cohort study.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sally StatonInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: s.staton@uq.edu.au.
Peter S RankinInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Mollie HardingInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Simon S SmithInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Emily WestwoodInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Monique K LeBourgeoisSleep and Development Laboratory, Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, USA.
Karen J ThorpeInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Sensitivity of the Circadian Clock to Light in Early ChildhoodR01HD087707 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WRIGHT, KENNETH P · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Sleep and the Neural Basis of Emotion Processing in ChildhoodR21MH110765 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI LEBOURGEOIS, MONIQUE K · 2016 to 2017
$450k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The onset of monophasic sleep, in which napping ceases and sleep consolidates into a single night period, is a key developmental milestone of childhood. Yet to date, there is little consensus regarding the timing of cessation of napping in children. The aim of the current study is to examine global evidence regarding napping patterns in childhood, and, through meta-analysis, describe patterns of napping cessation and duration observed in children aged 0-12 y. A systematic search of all published, original research articles reporting children's napping patterns, by age, was conducted. The quality of studies was assessed, and meta-analysis of eligible studies undertaken. Risk of bias and heterogeneity of measurement was high. Current evidence indicates that less than 2.5% of children cease napping prior to age 2, while 94% cease napping by age 5. The preschool period (3-5 y; 36-60 mo) represents a particularly dynamic period in napping cessation, with large variation in rates of napping across studies evidencing potential ecological effects. Future studies should focus on understanding of the underlying mechanisms explaining individual variations in napping patterns and the extent to which patterns of napping may represent a marker of child development.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentDisorders of Excessive SomnolenceAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCircadian RhythmHumansInfantInfant, NewbornSleepTime FactorsCessationChildrenDaytimeDiurnalInfantsMonophasicNapPatternsSleepTransition

Identifiers

PMID31862445
PMCPMC9704850
OpenAlexW2990459664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.