ReviewThe Journal of investigative dermatology2020
Using Implementation Science to Optimize the Uptake of Evidence-Based Medicine into Dermatology Practice.
Review in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulating the impact of an educational and digital approach using patient journey modelling to overcome practical challenges in the management of chronic spontaneous urticaria in Germany.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026Article
- Review
- Evidence to practice - lessons learnt in developing an implementation strategy for an online digital health intervention (Eczema Care Online).BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Navigating the field of implementation science towards maturity: challenges and opportunities.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
- Article
- Developing and implementing approaches to limit antimicrobial resistance.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2022Article
- Using Implementation Science to Understand Teledermatology Implementation Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An estimated 17-year lag exists between evidence generation and its integration into routine clinical care. The field of implementation science has emerged to close this gap by applying rigorous methods to systematically study the obstacles and facilitators of the uptake of evidence-based practices. However, implementation science has not gained wide traction in dermatology. In this narrative review, we use literature and expert input to introduce implementation science and key frameworks for implementing interventions and evaluating their uptake. We then highlight opportunities for dermatology-specific interventions at the patient-, provider-, system-, and population-levels, and advocate for the field's expansion into dermatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.