Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31861999›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2019

MethylToSNP: identifying SNPs in Illumina DNA methylation array data.

Brenna A LaBarre, Alexander Goncearenco, Hanna M Petrykowska, Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri, M S Riana Bornman, Vanessa M Hayes, Laura Elnitski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Profiling Genome-Wide Methylation Patterns in Cattle Infected withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Brenna A LaBarreGraduate Program in Bioinformatics, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Alexander GoncearencoGenomic Functional Analysis Section, Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 49 Convent Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Hanna M PetrykowskaGenomic Functional Analysis Section, Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 49 Convent Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Weerachai JaratlerdsiriLaboratory for Human Comparative & Prostate Cancer Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
M S Riana BornmanSchool of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa.
Vanessa M HayesLaboratory for Human Comparative & Prostate Cancer Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Laura ElnitskiGenomic Functional Analysis Section, Translational and Functional Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 49 Convent Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. elnitski@mail.nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-1065-019X
National Institutes of Health · USBoston University · USGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

Regulatory and epigenetic landscapes reveal biological processes, disease mechanisms and diagnostic markersZIAHG200323 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ELNITSKI, LAURA L · 2009 to 2025
$27.6M
Australian Research Council DP170103071Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200323NHGRI NIH HHS 1ZIAHG200323-14University of Sydney Foundation Petre Foundation chair
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent array-based methods for the measurement of DNA methylation rely on the process of sodium bisulfite conversion to differentiate between methylated and unmethylated cytosine bases in DNA. In the absence of genotype data this process can lead to ambiguity in data interpretation when a sample has polymorphisms at a methylation probe site. A common way to minimize this problem is to exclude such potentially problematic sites, with some methods removing as much as 60% of array probes from consideration before data analysis.

resultsHere, we present an algorithm implemented in an R Bioconductor package, MethylToSNP, which detects a characteristic data pattern to infer sites likely to be confounded by polymorphisms. Additionally, the tool provides a stringent reliability score to allow thresholding on SNP predictions. We calibrated parameters and thresholds used by the algorithm on simulated and real methylation data sets. We illustrate findings using methylation data from YRI (Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria), CEPH (European descent) and KhoeSan (southern African) populations. Our polymorphism predictions made using MethylToSNP have been validated through SNP databases and bisulfite and genomic sequencing.

conclusionsThe benefits of this method are threefold. First, it prevents extensive data loss by considering only SNPs specific to the individuals in the study. Second, it offers the possibility to identify new polymorphisms in samples for which there is little known about the genetic landscape. Third, it identifies variants as they exist in functional regions of a genome, such as in CTCF (transcriptional repressor) sites and enhancers, that may be common alleles or personal mutations with potential to deleteriously affect genomic regulatory activities. We demonstrate that MethylToSNP is applicable to the Illumina 450K and Illumina 850K EPIC array data and is also backwards compatible to the 27K methylation arrays. Going forward, this kind of nuanced approach can increase the amount of information derived from precious data sets by considering samples of the project individually to enable more informed decisions about data cleaning.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNA MethylationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUser-Computer InterfaceCpG IslandsDatabases, GeneticEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpigenomicsGenome, HumanHumansNamibiaOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisBisulfite sequencingCTCF sitesData analysisEnhancersIllumina methylation arrayMethylation probesPolymorphismsSingle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

Identifiers

PMID31861999
PMCPMC6923858
OpenAlexW2996041871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.