Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31861970›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2020

Bioprinted Skin Recapitulates Normal Collagen Remodeling in Full-Thickness Wounds.

Adam M Jorgensen, Mathew Varkey, Anastasiya Gorkun, Cara Clouse, Lei Xu, Zishuai Chou, Sean V Murphy, Joseph Molnar, Sang Jin Lee, James J Yoo and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterization of cutaneous wound healing in swine.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Skin substitutes: from conventional to 3D bioprinting.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Trends in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  14. Comprehensive biocompatibility profiling of human pancreas-derived biomaterial.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam M JorgensenWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Mathew VarkeyWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Anastasiya GorkunWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Cara ClouseWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Lei XuWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Zishuai ChouWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Sean V MurphyWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Joseph MolnarWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Sang Jin LeeWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
James J YooWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Shay SokerWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Anthony AtalaWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Forest Institute · USWake Forest University · USSechenov University · RU

Funding

Integration And Remodeling Of Bioprinted Skin In Full-Thickness Wound HealingF30AR074866 · NIAMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JORGENSEN, ADAM · 2019 to 2023
$248k
NIAMS NIH HHS F30 AR074866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 1 million burn injuries are treated annually in the United States, and current tissue engineered skin fails to meet the need for full-thickness replacement. Bioprinting technology has allowed fabrication of full-thickness skin and has demonstrated the ability to close full-thickness wounds. However, analysis of collagen remodeling in wounds treated with bioprinted skin has not been reported. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the utility of bioprinted skin for epidermal barrier formation and normal collagen remodeling in full-thickness wounds. Human keratinocytes, melanocytes, fibroblasts, dermal microvascular endothelial cells, follicle dermal papilla cells, and adipocytes were suspended in fibrinogen bioink and bioprinted to form a tri-layer skin structure. Bioprinted skin was implanted onto 2.5 × 2.5 cm full-thickness excisional wounds on athymic mice, compared with wounds treated with hydrogel only or untreated wounds. Total wound closure, epithelialization, and contraction were quantified, and skin samples were harvested at 21 days for histology. Picrosirius red staining was used to quantify collagen fiber orientation, length, and width. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed to confirm epidermal barrier formation, dermal maturation, vascularity, and human cell integration. All bioprinted skin treated wounds closed by day 21, compared with open control wounds. Wound closure in bioprinted skin treated wounds was primarily due to epithelialization. In contrast, control hydrogel and untreated groups had sparse wound coverage and incomplete closure driven primarily by contraction. Picrosirius red staining confirmed a normal basket weave collagen organization in bioprinted skin-treated wounds compared with parallel collagen fibers in hydrogel only and untreated wounds. IHC staining at day 21 demonstrated the presence of human cells in the regenerated dermis, the formation of a stratified epidermis, dermal maturation, and blood vessel formation in bioprinted skin, none of which was present in control hydrogel treated wounds. Bioprinted skin accelerated full-thickness wound closure by promoting epidermal barrier formation, without increasing contraction. This healing process is associated with human cells from the bioprinted skin laying down a healthy, basket-weave collagen network. The remodeled skin is phenotypically similar to human skin and composed of a composite of graft and infiltrating host cells. Impact statement We have demonstrated the ability of bioprinted skin to enhance closure of full-thickness wounds through epithelialization and normal collagen remodeling. To our knowledge, this article is the first to quantify collagen remodeling by bioprinted skin in full-thickness wounds. Our methods and results can be used to guide further investigation of collagen remodeling by tissue engineered skin products to improve ongoing and future bioprinting skin studies. Ultimately, our skin bioprinting technology could translate into a new treatment for full-thickness wounds in human patients with the ability to recapitulate normal collagen remodeling in full-thickness wounds.

Indexed as

AnimalsBioprintingCollagenFibroblastsHumansKeratinocytesMaleMiceMice, NudeMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSkinTissue EngineeringCollagenanimal modelsbioprintingextracellular matrixskintissue engineeringwound healing

Identifiers

PMID31861970
PMCPMC7249461
OpenAlexW2995722402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.