Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31861916›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Current Understanding of the Biomechanics of Ventricular Tissues in Heart Failure.

Wenqiang Liu, Zhijie Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Passive biaxial mechanical properties of sheep myocardium.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  3. Image-Based Estimation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Stiffness.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2025
    Article
  4. Brillouin microscopy.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Introduction to the Special Issue onBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenqiang LiuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2323-7962
Zhijie WangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9551-516X
Colorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure is the leading cause of death worldwide, and the most common cause of heart failure is ventricular dysfunction. It is well known that the ventricles are anisotropic and viscoelastic tissues and their mechanical properties change in diseased states. The tissue mechanical behavior is an important determinant of the function of ventricles. The aim of this paper is to review the current understanding of the biomechanics of ventricular tissues as well as the clinical significance. We present the common methods of the mechanical measurement of ventricles, the known ventricular mechanical properties including the viscoelasticity of the tissue, the existing computational models, and the clinical relevance of the ventricular mechanical properties. Lastly, we suggest some future research directions to elucidate the roles of the ventricular biomechanics in the ventricular dysfunction to inspire new therapies for heart failure patients.

Indexed as

anisotropyfibrosismyocardiumstiffnessviscoelastic property

Identifiers

PMID31861916
PMCPMC7175293
OpenAlexW2995241084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.