ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019
Optimising the Efficacy of Equine Welfare Communications: Do Equine Stakeholders Differ in Their Information-Seeking Behaviour and Communication Preferences?
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying by Radiograph Grade 4 Aplasia of the Caudal Lamina Ventralis in the Equine Sixth Cervical Vertebra and Three Coinciding Morphological Variations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Choice for the horse is paramount: Owners' experiences in facilitating friends, forage, and freedom in their management practices.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026Article
- Challenges for the veterinary profession: A grounded theory study of veterinarians' experiences of caring for older horses.Equine veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Education and Licensing of Horse Owners: Addressing Poor Horse Welfare in the UK.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- "But my horse is well cared for": A qualitative exploration of cognitive dissonance and enculturation in equestrian attitudes toward performance horses and their welfare.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2025Article
- Becoming a matter of veterinary concern.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- How equestrians conceptualise horse welfare: Does it facilitate or hinder change?Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2023Article
- Noseband Fit: Measurements and Perceptions of Canadian Equestrians.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Information-Seeking Preferences of the Colorado Equine Industry for Distribution of Disease Outbreak Information.Journal of equine veterinary science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Information on the management of animals within domestic environments is freely available to animal owners and caregivers either online, or in paper form by request. However, awareness is growing within the animal welfare sector that simply providing written guidelines or educational material is not enough to affect a positive change in owners in relation to animal welfare. In the quest to improve equine welfare, understanding the way that owners and other stakeholders seek information and their communication preferences is key to effective dissemination of up to date equine welfare information and research findings. Three UK equine stakeholder groups-horse owners, livery yard owners, and equine veterinarians-were surveyed online to find out where they sought equine information. Their awareness of equine welfare Codes of Practice, how they respond when they are asked to give advice to horse owners and their communication preferences were included within the survey. All three stakeholder groups tended to seek information from people rather than from organisations, or digital and printed resources. Veterinarians were the most used information source across all three stakeholder groups This highlighted the importance of ensuring that equine veterinarians have access to up to date, evidence-based equine welfare information. While the majority of participants were aware of the equine welfare Code of Practice, fewer had actually read it, this was true particularly amongst horse owners. The primary reasons for this were the features of the Code as well as the issuing organisation. The stakeholders expressed a preference for information to be communicated in a neutral or positive way rather than focusing on negative aspects. Our findings suggest that industry professionals, particularly veterinarians, have an important role to play in knowledge transfer and the dissemination of research findings to horse owners. The efficacy of equine welfare communication could be improved if the information delivery preferences of equine stakeholders are were taken into consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.