Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31861690›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Meniscus-Derived Matrix Bioscaffolds: Effects of Concentration and Cross-Linking on Meniscus Cellular Responses and Tissue Repair.

Lucas P Lyons, Sofia Hidalgo Perea, J Brice Weinberg, Jocelyn R Wittstein, Amy L McNulty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meniscal repair: The current state and recent advances in augmentation.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Allografts for partial meniscus repair: anFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Meniscus cell regional phenotypes: Dedifferentiation and reversal by biomaterial embedding.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Meniscal substitution, a developing and long-awaited demand.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucas P LyonsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Sofia Hidalgo PereaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Brice WeinbergDepartment of Medicine, VA Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Jocelyn R WittsteinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Amy L McNultyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

Mechanotransduction in Meniscus Health and RepairR01AR073221 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCNULTY, AMY L · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
Lord Foundation Shared Materials Instrumentation Facility (SMIF) Undergraduate User ProgramNIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073221NIH HHS AR073221Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation Funding provided by the Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationVA Rehabilitation Research Service Merit Review Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meniscal injuries, particularly in the avascular zone, have a low propensity for healing and are associated with the development of osteoarthritis. Current meniscal repair techniques are limited to specific tear types and have significant risk for failure. In previous work, we demonstrated the ability of meniscus-derived matrix (MDM) scaffolds to augment the integration and repair of an in vitro meniscus defect. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of percent composition and dehydrothermal (DHT) or genipin cross-linking of MDM bioscaffolds on primary meniscus cellular responses and integrative meniscus repair. In all scaffolds, the porous microenvironment allowed for exogenous cell infiltration and proliferation, as well as endogenous meniscus cell migration. The genipin cross-linked scaffolds promoted extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and/or retention. The shear strength of integrative meniscus repair was improved with increasing percentages of MDM and genipin cross-linking. Overall, the 16% genipin cross-linked scaffolds were most effective at enhancing integrative meniscus repair. The ability of the genipin cross-linked scaffolds to attract endogenous meniscus cells, promote glycosaminoglycan and collagen deposition, and enhance integrative meniscus repair reveals that these MDM scaffolds are promising tools to augment meniscus healing.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell ProliferationCells, CulturedExtracellular MatrixFemaleIridoidsMeniscusShear StrengthSwineTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsgenipinIridoidsbiomechanicalcartilagefibrochondrocytejointkneeproteoglycanregenerationtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID31861690
PMCPMC6981607
OpenAlexW2995432370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.