Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31861603›Full record

ArticleCancers2019

Brain Invasion along Perivascular Spaces by Glioma Cells: Relationship with Blood-Brain Barrier.

Simone Pacioni, Quintino Giorgio D'Alessandris, Mariachiara Buccarelli, Alessandra Boe, Maurizio Martini, Luigi Maria Larocca, Giulia Bolasco, Lucia Ricci-Vitiani, Maria Laura Falchetti, Roberto Pallini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Changes in Tissue Fluidity Predict Tumor Aggressiveness In Vivo.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Simone PacioniInstitute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Quintino Giorgio D'AlessandrisInstitute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Mariachiara BuccarelliDepartment of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 0161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1157-4694
Alessandra BoeCore Facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Maurizio MartiniInstitute of Human Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Luigi Maria LaroccaInstitute of Human Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1739-4758
Giulia BolascoEpigenetics & Neurobiology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL Rome), 00015 Monterotondo, Italy.
Lucia Ricci-VitianiDepartment of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 0161 Rome, Italy.
Maria Laura FalchettiCNR-IBBC, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 00015 Rome, Italy.
Roberto PalliniInstitute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · ITInstitute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute RF-2016-02361089Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Fondi d'Ateneo Linea D.1 2016, 2017 and 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The question whether perivascular glioma cells invading the brain far from the tumor bulk may disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents a crucial issue because under this condition tumor cells would be no more protected from the reach of chemotherapeutic drugs. A recent in vivo study that used human xenolines, demonstrated that single glioma cells migrating away from the tumor bulk are sufficient to breach the BBB. Here, we used brain xenografts of patient-derived glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) to show by immunostaining that in spite of massive perivascular invasion, BBB integrity was preserved in the majority of vessels located outside the tumor bulk. Interestingly, the tumor cells that invaded the brain for the longest distances traveled along vessels with retained BBB integrity. In surgical specimens of malignant glioma, the area of brain invasion showed several vessels with preserved BBB that were surrounded by tumor cells. On transmission electron microscopy, the cell inter-junctions and basal lamina of the brain endothelium were preserved even in conditions in which the tumor cells lay adjacently to blood vessels. In conclusion, BBB integrity associates with extensive perivascular invasion of glioma cells.

Indexed as

blood–brain barrierbrain endotheliumglioblastomaglioma stem-like cellsperivascular invasion

Identifiers

PMID31861603
PMCPMC7017006
OpenAlexW2995782489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.