Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31861495›Full record

ArticleGenes2019

Functionally Annotating Regulatory Elements in the Equine Genome Using Histone Mark ChIP-Seq.

N B Kingsley, Colin Kern, Catherine Creppe, Erin N Hales, Huaijun Zhou, T S Kalbfleisch, James N MacLeod, Jessica L Petersen, Carrie J Finno, Rebecca R Bellone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. AgAnimalGenomes: browsers for viewing and manually annotating farm animal genomes.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

N B KingsleyVeterinary Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Colin KernDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Catherine CreppeEpigenetics Services Team, Diagenode, Liège 4102, Belgium.
Erin N HalesDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Huaijun ZhouDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
T S KalbfleischGluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
James N MacLeodGluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Jessica L PetersenDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
Carrie J FinnoDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Rebecca R BelloneVeterinary Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Kentucky · USDiagenode (Belgium) · BEUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

Molecular pathogenesis of alpha-tocopherol associated neuroaxonal dystrophy in anK01OD015134 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI FINNO, CARRIE · 2013 to 2017
$599k
NCATS NIH HHS L40 TR001136NIH HHS K01 OD015134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the primary aims of the Functional Annotation of ANimal Genomes (FAANG) initiative is to characterize tissue-specific regulation within animal genomes. To this end, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-Seq) to map four histone modifications (H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac, and H3K27me3) in eight prioritized tissues collected as part of the FAANG equine biobank from two thoroughbred mares. Data were generated according to optimized experimental parameters developed during quality control testing. To ensure that we obtained sufficient ChIP and successful peak-calling, data and peak-calls were assessed using six quality metrics, replicate comparisons, and site-specific evaluations. Tissue specificity was explored by identifying binding motifs within unique active regions, and motifs were further characterized by gene ontology (GO) and protein-protein interaction analyses. The histone marks identified in this study represent some of the first resources for tissue-specific regulation within the equine genome. As such, these publicly available annotation data can be used to advance equine studies investigating health, performance, reproduction, and other traits of economic interest in the horse.

Indexed as

Regulatory Elements, TranscriptionalAnimalsChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingGenomeHistone CodeHorsesMolecular Sequence AnnotationOrgan SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAannotationepigeneticsFAANGgenome regulationH3K27acH3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3horsetissue-specific

Identifiers

PMID31861495
PMCPMC7017286
OpenAlexW2995224350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.