Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31861367›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Effectiveness of Lifestyle Health Promotion Interventions for Nurses: A Systematic Review.

Natalia Stanulewicz, Emily Knox, Melanie Narayanasamy, Noureen Shivji, Kamlesh Khunti, Holly Blake

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
43.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Effectiveness of Lifestyle Health Promotion Interventions for Nurses: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The association between PMEnvironmental research · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Examining Well-Being and Healthy Lifestyle Interventions among Nursing Students Worldwide: A Scoping Review.Journal of holistic nursing : official journal of the American Holistic Nurses' Association · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalia StanulewiczSchool of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.
Emily KnoxInfant Nutrition and Metabolism, University of Granada, 52005 Granada, Spain.
Melanie NarayanasamySchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Noureen ShivjiSchool of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK.
Kamlesh KhuntiDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Holly BlakeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBDe Montfort University · GBKeele University · GBUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior research has investigated various strategies to improve health, wellbeing and the job-related outcomes of nurses. However, the scope of this evidence is not clear and the types of intervention most likely to have positive outcomes are unknown.

objectiveTo provide an overview and synthesis of the effectiveness of interventions conducted with the goal of improving health, wellbeing and the job-related outcomes of nurses.

methodsA systematic database search was conducted from January 2000 to December 2018, with pre-defined criteria (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE and PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; PsycINFO; and BioMed Central). In total, 136 intervention studies with a total sample of 16,129 participants (range 9-3381) were included and evaluated. Data extraction, quality assessment and risk of bias analyses were performed.

resultsStudies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs; n = 52, 38%), randomised crossover design studies (n = 2, 1.5%) and non-randomised pre-post studies with a control group (n = 31, 23%) and without a control group (n = 51, 37.5%). The majority of interventions focused on education, physical activity, mindfulness, or relaxation. Thirty-seven (27%) studies had a multimodal intervention approach. On average, studies had relatively small samples (median = 61; mode = 30) and were conducted predominantly in North America (USA/Canada, n = 53). The findings were mixed overall, with some studies reporting benefits and others finding no effects. Dietary habits was the most successfully improved outcome (8/9), followed by indices of body composition (20/24), physical activity (PA) (11/14), and stress (49/66), with >70% of relevant studies in each of these categories reporting improvements. The lowest success rate was for work-related outcomes (16/32). Separate analysis of RCTs indicated that interventions that focus solely on education might be less likely to result in positive outcomes than interventions targeting behavioural change.

conclusionsInterventions targeting diet, body composition, PA, or stress are most likely to have positive outcomes for nurses' health and/or wellbeing. The methodologically strongest evidence (RCTs) is available for body composition and stress. Interventions relying solely on educational approaches are least likely to be effective. Organisational outcomes appear to be more challenging to change with lifestyle intervention, likely requiring more complex solutions including changes to the work environment. There is a need for more high-quality evidence since many studies had moderate or high risk of bias and low reporting quality.

Indexed as

ExerciseLife StyleRelaxationAdultFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedMindfulnessNursesEmployee wellbeingLifestyle interventionNursesSystematic reviewWorkplace intervention

Identifiers

PMID31861367
PMCPMC6981404
OpenAlexW2996455751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.