Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31861355›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2019

Experimental Challenges for Reduced Genomes: The Cell Model

Masaomi Kurokawa, Bei-Wen Ying

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Determination of the genome-scale metabolic network ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Development ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Complete sequence of the genome-reducedMicrobiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Mutations identified in engineeredFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biocircuits in plants and eukaryotic algae.Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masaomi KurokawaGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 305-8572 Ibaraki, Japan.
Bei-Wen YingGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 305-8572 Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 19H03215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome reduction, as a top-down approach to obtain the minimal genetic information essential for a living organism, has been conducted with bacterial cells for decades. The most popular and well-studied cell models for genome reduction are

Indexed as

Escherichia coliexperimental evolutiongenome reductiongrowth rateminimal genome

Identifiers

PMID31861355
PMCPMC7022904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.