ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019
Neglected Urban Villages in Current Vector Surveillance System: Evidences in Guangzhou, China.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Not here yet, but one bite away: Risk for vector-borne zoonotic diseases.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Review
- Review
- Fine-Scale Risk Mapping for Dengue Vector Using Spatial Downscaling in Intra-Urban Areas of Guangzhou, China.Insects · 2025Article
- Comparison of falls and risk factors among older adults in urban villages, urban and rural areas of Shantou, China.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Advancing knowledge of One Health in China: lessons for One Health from China's dengue control and prevention programs.Science in One Health · 2024Review
- Influences of Differentiated Residence and Workplace Location on the Identification of Spatiotemporal Patterns of Dengue Epidemics: A Case Study in Guangzhou, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.