Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31861180›Full record

ArticleGenes2019

A 24-Month Follow-Up Study of the Effect of Intra-Articular Injection of Autologous Microfragmented Fat Tissue on Proteoglycan Synthesis in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.

Igor Borić, Damir Hudetz, Eduard Rod, Željko Jeleč, Trpimir Vrdoljak, Andrea Skelin, Ozren Polašek, Mihovil Plečko, Irena Trbojević-Akmačić, Gordan Lauc and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Adipose-derived and bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections for osteoarthritis: A scoping review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Igor BorićSt. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 49210 Zabok/10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-0607-2462
Damir HudetzSt. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 49210 Zabok/10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Eduard RodSt. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 49210 Zabok/10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Željko JelečSt. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 49210 Zabok/10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-0475-0197
Trpimir VrdoljakClinical Hospital "Sveti Duh", 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Andrea SkelinSt. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 49210 Zabok/10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Ozren PolašekSchool of Medicine, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Mihovil PlečkoSt. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 49210 Zabok/10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-6569-9287
Irena Trbojević-AkmačićGenos Glycoscience Research Laboratory, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-0106-0155
Gordan LaucGenos Glycoscience Research Laboratory, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Dragan PrimoracSt. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 49210 Zabok/10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Genos (Croatia) · HRPsychiatric Hospital Sveti Ivan · HRLee College · USUniversity North · HRUniversity of Mostar · BAUniversity of Osijek · HRUniversity of Split · HRUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a widely prevalent disease worldwide, and with an increasingly ageing society, it has become a challenge for the field of regenerative medicine. OA is a disease process involving multiple joint tissues, including those not visible on radiography, and is a complex disease process with multiple phenotypes that require evaluation by a multimodality imaging assessment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of micro-fragmented fat tissue intra-articular injection 24 months after application in two ways: Indirectly using functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment analyzing the glycosaminoglycans (GAG) content in cartilage by means of delayed gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC), as well as clinical outcome on observed level of GAG using standard orthopedic physical examination including VAS assessment. In our previous study assessing comprehensive results after 12 months, the dGEMRIC results have drawn attention. The present study explores the long-term effect of intra-articular injection of autologous microfragmented adipose tissue to host chondrocytes and cartilage proteoglycans in patients with knee OA. A prospective, non-randomized, interventional, single-center, open-label clinical trial was conducted from January 2016 to April 2018. A total of 17 patients were enrolled in the study, and 32 knees were assessed in a 12-month follow-up, but only 10 patients of them with 18 knees are included in a 24-month follow-up. The rest of the seven patients dropped out of the study 12 months after follow-up: three patients underwent knee arthroplasty, and the remaining four did not fulfil the basic criteria of 24 months involvement in the study. Surgical intervention (lipoaspiration), followed by tissue processing and intra-articular injection of the final microfragmented adipose tissue product into the affected knee(s), was performed in all patients. Patients were assessed for a visual analog scale (VAS), dGEMRIC at the baseline, three, six, 12 and 24 months after the treatment. A magnetic resonance sequence in dGEMRIC due to infiltration of the anionic, negatively-charged contrast gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA2) into the cartilage indicated that the contents of cartilage glycosaminoglycans significantly increased in specific areas of the treated knee joint. Our results suggest that this method of single intra-articular injection of autologous microfragmented adipose tissue improves GAG content on a significant scale, with over half of the measurements suggesting relevant improvement 24 months after intra-articular injection opposed to the expected GAG decrease over the natural course of the disease.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCartilage, ArticularContrast MediaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGadolinium DTPAGlycosaminoglycansHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAGlycosaminoglycansadipose tissuecartilagedGEMRICglycosaminoglycansknee osteoarthritismesenchymal stem cellregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID31861180
PMCPMC6947241
OpenAlexW2996430765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.