Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31860657›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

What factors do make quality improvement work in primary health care? Experiences of maternal health quality improvement teams in three Puskesmas in Indonesia.

Ralalicia Limato, Patricia Tumbelaka, Rukhsana Ahmed, Sudirman Nasir, Din Syafruddin, Hermen Ormel, Meghan Bruce Kumar, Miriam Taegtmeyer, Maryse Kok

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Characterization of Communes with Quality Accredited Primary Healthcare Centers in Chile.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ralalicia LimatoMalaria and Vector Resistance Laboratory, Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5306-3254
Patricia TumbelakaMalaria and Vector Resistance Laboratory, Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Rukhsana AhmedMalaria and Vector Resistance Laboratory, Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Sudirman NasirSchool of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Din SyafruddinMalaria and Vector Resistance Laboratory, Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Hermen OrmelKIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Meghan Bruce KumarDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Miriam TaegtmeyerDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Maryse KokKIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology · IDRoyal Tropical Institute · NLEmory University · USHasanuddin University · IDLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndonesia has been shifting from ensuring access to health services towards improving service quality. Accreditation has been used as quality assurance (QA) mechanism, first in hospitals and subsequently in primary health care facilities, including Puskesmas (community health centres). QA provides measures of whether services meet quality targets, but quality improvement (QI) is needed to make change and achieve improvements. QI is a cyclical process with cycles of problem identification, solution testing and observation. We investigated the factors which influenced the process of QI based on experience of maternal health QI teams in three Puskesmas in Cianjur district, West Java province, Indonesia.

methodsQualitative data were collected using 28 in-depth interviews at two points of time: pre- (April 2016) and post- QI intervention (April 2017), involving national, provincial, district and Puskesmas managers; and Puskesmas QI team members. Thematic analysis of transcripts was conducted.

resultsWe found four main factors contributed to the process of QI: 1) leadership, including awareness and attitude of leader(s) towards QI, involvement of leader(s) in the QI process and decision-making in budget allocation for QI; 2) staff enthusiasm and multidisciplinary collaboration; 3) a culture where QI is integrated in existing responsibilities; and 4) the ongoing Puskesmas accreditation process, which increased the value of QI to the organisation.

conclusionMaking QI a success in the decentralised Indonesian system requires action at four levels. At individual level, leadership attributes can create an internal quality environment and drive organisational cultural change. At team level, staff enthusiasm and collaboration can be triggered through engaging and tasking everyone in the QI process and having a shared vision of what quality should look like. At organisational level, QI should be integrated in planned activities, ensuring financial and human resources. Lastly, QI can be encouraged when it is implemented by the wider health system as part of national accreditation programmes.

Indexed as

LeadershipMaternal HealthPatient Care TeamAccreditationDelivery of Health CareFemaleHospitalsHumansIndonesiaMaternal Health ServicesOrganizational InnovationPregnancyPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID31860657
PMCPMC6924663
OpenAlexW2996750909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.