ArticlePloS one2019
Complete chloroplast genomes of two Siraitia Merrill species: Comparative analysis, positive selection and novel molecular marker development.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Comparative plastid genomics of Hippophae reveals phylogenetic relationships and provides candidate DNA markers for taxonomic identification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative plastome analysis of Schweinfurthia papilionacea and Schweinfurthia imbricata clarifying their taxonomic position in Lamiales.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Codon Usage Bias Analysis in the Chloroplast Genome ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Elucidation of the phylogeny of Cucurbitaceae, particularly Trichosanthes, based on plastome data and nuclear single-copy genes.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Plastomic studies inform the mechanisms of edaphic adaptation in North American species in the tribe Thelypodieae (Brassicaceae).American journal of botany · 2025Article
- Codon usage patterns and genomic variation analysis of chloroplast genomes provides new insights into the evolution of Aroideae.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Characterization of Firmiana danxiaensis plastomes and comparative analysis of Firmiana: insight into its phylogeny and evolution.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
- New Insights into Phylogenetic Relationship ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of Asparagus meioclados Levl. and Asparagus munitus Wang et S. C. Chen plastomes and utility of plastomes mutational hotspots.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The complete chloroplast genome of Ulmus mianzhuensis with insights into structural variations, adaptive evolution, and phylogenetic relationships of Ulmus (Ulmaceae).BMC genomics · 2023Article
- The First Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2023Article
- Comparative chloroplast genome analysis of seven extant Citrullus species insight into genetic variation, phylogenetic relationships, and selective pressure.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of WRKY Transcription Factors inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Phylogenomics and plastome evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Comparative plastomes and phylogenetic analysis of seven Korean endemic Saussurea (Asteraceae).BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Comprehensive Comparative Analysis and Development of Molecular Markers forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Complete chloroplast genome of Lilium ledebourii (Baker) Boiss and its comparative analysis: lights into selective pressure and adaptive evolution.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequences of three aroideae species (Araceae): lights into selective pressure, marker development and phylogenetic relationships.BMC genomics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Siraitia grosvenorii fruit, known as Luo-Han-Guo, has been used as a traditional Chinese medicine for many years, and mogrosides are its primary active ingredients. Unfortunately, Siraitia siamensis, its wild relative, might be misused due to its indistinguishable appearance, not only threatening the reliability of the medication but also partly exacerbating wild resource scarcity. Therefore, high-resolution genetic markers must be developed to discriminate between these species. Here, the complete chloroplast genomes of S. grosvenorii and S. siamensis were assembled and analyzed for the first time; they were 158,757 and 159,190 bp in length, respectively, and possessed conserved quadripartite circular structures. Both contained 134 annotated genes, including 8 rRNA, 37 tRNA and 89 protein-coding genes. Twenty divergences (Pi > 0.03) were found in the intergenic regions. Nine protein-coding genes, accD, atpA, atpE, atpF, clpP, ndhF, psbH, rbcL, and rpoC2, underwent selection within Cucurbitaceae. Phylogenetic relationship analysis indicated that these two species originated from the same ancestor. Finally, four pairs of molecular markers were developed to distinguish the two species. The results of this study will be beneficial for taxonomic research, identification and conservation of Siraitia Merrill wild resources in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.