Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31860181›Full record

Observational studyBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2019

Recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from patients with acute appendicitis using blood culture bottles

Adriana Jiménez, Andrés Sánchez, Andrés Rey, Claudia Fajardo

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bloodstream infections and antibiotic resistance at a regional hospital, Colombia, 2019-2021.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  2. Bacterial pathogens in pediatric appendicitis: a comprehensive retrospective study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adriana JiménezUnidad de Prevención y Control de Infecciones, Hospital de San José, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Facultad de Medicina, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. amjimenez@fucsalud.edu.co.
Andrés Sánchez
Andrés Rey
Claudia Fajardo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Acute appendicitis is the first cause of acute abdomen, however, there is a little information about the associated bacteria and its sensibility profile. Objetive: To identify and to determine the resistance pattern of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria isolated in periapendicular fluid cultures taken in patients with acute appendicitis and to establish the proportions of isolates according to the clinical phase. Materials and methods: A descriptive and prospective study was undertaken at the Hospital Universitario de San José (Bogotá, Colombia) of patients older than sixteen years of age, undergoing an open appendectomy. A sample of periappendiceal fluid was taken, which was deposited directly into aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles. Results: One hundred and fifty-four patients were included. The overall positivity of cultures was 87% (n=1344); 77% (n=118) for aerobes and 51% (n=79) for anaerobes. The proportion of positive cultures was lower in the uncomplicated appendicitis cases as compared to the complicated ones (80% (66/83) vs. 95%(67/71), p = 0.003). The microorganisms isolated most frequently were: Escherichia coli (53%) (n=84); Bacteroides spp. (25%) (n=25); Propionibacterium acnes (21%) (n=21); coagulase negative Staphylococci (17%) (n=27); Enterococcus spp. (11%) (n=15), and Fusobacterium spp. (11%) (n=11). The sensitivity of E. coli to ampicillin/sulbactam was 30%. The sensitivity of Bacteroides spp. to clindamycin and ampicillin/sulbactam was 91%. All anaerobe isolates were sensitive to piperacillin/tazobactam, ertapenem, meropenem and metronidazole. Conclusions: Intraoperative cultures in acute appendicits are relevant in order to determine the local epidemiological pattern and to establish prophylactic and therapeutic antibiotics for this pathology; direct inoculation in blood culture bottles allows a high recovery of microorganisms.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppendicitisBacteria, AerobicBacteria, AnaerobicBacteroidesBlood CultureEnterococcusEscherichia coliFemaleFusobacteriumHumansMaleanaerobicappendectomyappendicitisascitic fluidBacteriasBacteroides fragilismicrobial sensitivity test

Identifiers

PMID31860181
PMCPMC7363352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.