Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31860110›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2019

Effect of Parental Counseling on Infants' Healthy Sleep Habits in Brazil: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Iná S Santos, Bianca Del-Ponte, Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues, Camila S Halal, Alicia Matijasevich, Suélen Cruz, Luciana Anselmi, Mariângela Freitas Silveira, Pedro R Curi Hallal, Diego G Bassani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02788630 (Infant Sleep Hygiene Counseling), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02788630 nacompletednot on this map

Infant Sleep Hygiene Counseling: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of PelotasRan2015 to 2016Enrolled552ConditionsSleepArmsSleep hygiene counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Increased risk for excessive weight gain in infants who sleep less than 12 hours per 24 hours.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Iná S SantosPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Bianca Del-PontePostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Luciana Tovo-RodriguesPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Camila S HalalNossa Senhora da Conceição Children's Hospital, Brazilian Ministry of Health, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Alicia MatijasevichPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Suélen CruzPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Luciana AnselmiPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Mariângela Freitas SilveiraPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Pedro R Curi HallalPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Diego G BassaniDepartment of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRHospital for Sick Children · CAMinistério da Saúde · BR

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 095582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Poor sleep during early childhood is associated with adverse outcomes, including obesity, cognitive impairment, and mental and behavioral disorders. Objective: To assess the efficacy of an educational intervention in the promotion of nighttime sleep duration. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-blind, intent-to-treat randomized clinical trial included participants in Pelotas, Brazil, aged 3 months who were followed up until age 24 months. Eligibility criteria included healthy infants aged approximately 3 months who slept less than 15 hours per 24 hours. Infants were randomized to the intervention group or control group. Interventions: Information on sleep characteristics, improvements in the environment, establishment of a nighttime sleep routine, and waiting before attending nocturnal awakenings was delivered to mothers in the intervention group by trained home-visitors at baseline. The intervention group received a telephone call on the first and second day after the intervention and a home visit on the third day after the intervention. The intervention's content was reinforced at health care visits for ages 6 months and 12 months. Mothers allocated to the control group were counseled on the benefits of breastfeeding for the mother's and child's health and given written material with content on breastfeeding. Main Outcomes and Measures: Nighttime sleep duration was measured by interview and actigraphy at baseline and ages 6, 12, and 24 months and diaries at baseline and age 6 months. At ages 3 and 6 months, nighttime sleep self-regulation was calculated by subtracting nighttime sleep duration recorded by actigraphy from nighttime sleep duration recorded in the diaries and at ages 12 and 24 months by subtracting nighttime sleep duration recorded by actigraphy from nighttime sleep duration obtained by interview. Results: Among 1812 mother-infant dyads invited to participate, 798 met the inclusion criteria and 586 agreed to participate. The intervention group included 298 infants (154 [52.9%] boys), and the control group included 288 infants (164 [58.2%] boys). At age 6 months, mean (SD) nighttime sleep duration recorded in diaries was 9.80 (1.85) hours in the intervention group and 9.49 (2.07) hours in the control group, a difference of 19 minutes longer for the intervention group. At age 12 months, mean (SD) nighttime sleep duration based on the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire was 8.43 (1.35) hours in the intervention group and 8.52 (1.35) hours in the control group, a difference of 5 minutes shorter for the intervention group. At age 24 months, compared with information from the interview, actigraphy records showed that children in the intervention group stayed awake at night without signalizing for a mean (SD) of 0.52 (2.52) hours, whereas children in the control group stayed awake at night without signalizing for a mean (SD) of 0.23 (2.43) hours. There were no statistically significant difference between groups in any of the sleep parameters investigated. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that the educational intervention did not achieve longer nighttime sleep duration among infants in the intervention group. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02788630.

Indexed as

Infant HealthSleepBrazilCounselingFemaleHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansInfantMaleParent-Child RelationsParentsSingle-Blind MethodTelephone

Identifiers

PMID31860110
PMCPMC6991232
OpenAlexW2995606740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.