ArticleJAMA pediatrics2020
Assessment of Extubation Readiness Using Spontaneous Breathing Trials in Extremely Preterm Neonates.
Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peri-extubation settings in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Pooled it
- Predictors of extubation failure in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Pooled it
- European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update.Neonatology · 2023Guideline
- Predictors of extubation success for premature infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- The effect of postnatal steroids on lung ultrasound scores and extubation readiness in very low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function during weaning and after extubation in preterm newborns: brief report.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Association between the respiratory severity score and extubation success in severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Observational
- Sonographic evaluation of lungs and diaphragm as a predictor for extubation failure in early preterm neonates: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- [Risk factors and prognosis of first extubation failure in neonates undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Article
- AI models in clinical neonatology: a review of modeling approaches and a consensus proposal for standardized reporting of model performance.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Predicting extubation failure in neonates: The role of lung ultrasound and corrected gestational age in safe weaning in the NICU.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Article
- Ventilator variables predicting extubation readiness in extremely premature infants with prolonged mechanical ventilation: A retrospective observational study.Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Observational
- Predicting Extubation Readiness in Preterm Infants Utilizing Machine Learning: A Diagnostic Utility Study.The Journal of pediatrics · 2024Observational
- Predictors of successful extubation from volume-targeted ventilation in extremely preterm neonates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Article
- A clinical informatics approach to bronchopulmonary dysplasia: current barriers and future possibilities.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Review
- Lung Ultrasound Score: Does It Really Predict Extubation Failure?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2023Article
- Feasibility of Endotracheal Extubation Evaluation Form in Predicting Successful Extubation in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Respiratory Management of the Preterm Infant: Supporting Evidence-Based Practice at the Bedside.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Weaning and extubation from neonatal mechanical ventilation: an evidenced-based review.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are used to determine extubation readiness in extremely preterm neonates (gestational age ≤28 weeks), but these trials rely on empirical combinations of clinical events during endotracheal continuous positive airway pressure (ET-CPAP). Objectives: To describe clinical events during ET-CPAP and to assess accuracy of comprehensive clinical event combinations in predicting successful extubation compared with clinical judgment alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter diagnostic study used data from 259 neonates seen at 5 neonatal intensive care units from the prospective Automated Prediction of Extubation Readiness (APEX) study from September 1, 2013, through August 31, 2018. Neonates with birth weight less than 1250 g who required mechanical ventilation were eligible. Neonates deemed to be ready for extubation and who underwent ET-CPAP before extubation were included. Interventions: In the APEX study, cardiorespiratory signals were recorded during 5-minute ET-CPAP, and signs of clinical instability were monitored. Main Outcomes and Measures: Four clinical events were documented during ET-CPAP: apnea requiring stimulation, presence and cumulative durations of bradycardia and desaturation, and increased supplemental oxygen. Clinical event occurrence was assessed and compared between extubation pass and fail (defined as reintubation within 7 days). An automated algorithm was developed to generate SBT definitions using all clinical event combinations and to compute diagnostic accuracies of an SBT in predicting extubation success. Results: Of 259 neonates (139 [54%] male) with a median gestational age of 26.1 weeks (interquartile range [IQR], 24.9-27.4 weeks) and median birth weight of 830 g (IQR, 690-1019 g), 147 (57%) had at least 1 clinical event during ET-CPAP. Apneas occurred in 10% (26 of 259) of neonates, bradycardias in 19% (48), desaturations in 53% (138), and increased oxygen needs in 41% (107). Neonates with successful extubation (71% [184 of 259]) had significantly fewer clinical events (51% [93 of 184] vs 72% [54 of 75], P = .002), shorter cumulative bradycardia duration (median, 0 seconds [IQR, 0 seconds] vs 0 seconds [IQR, 0-9 seconds], P < .001), shorter cumulative desaturation duration (median, 0 seconds [IQR, 0-59 seconds] vs 25 seconds [IQR, 0-90 seconds], P = .003), and less increase in oxygen (median, 0% [IQR, 0%-6%] vs 5% [0%-18%], P < .001) compared with neonates with failed extubation. In total, 41 602 SBT definitions were generated, demonstrating sensitivities of 51% to 100% (median, 96%) and specificities of 0% to 72% (median, 22%). Youden indices for all SBTs ranged from 0 to 0.32 (median, 0.17), suggesting low accuracy. The SBT with highest Youden index defined SBT pass as having no apnea (with desaturation requiring stimulation) or increase in oxygen requirements by 15% from baseline and predicted extubation success with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 39%. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that extremely preterm neonates commonly show signs of clinical instability during ET-CPAP and that the accuracy of multiple clinical event combinations to define SBTs is low. Thus, SBTs may provide little added value in the assessment of extubation readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.