Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31859681›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2019

Understanding End-User Perspectives of Mobile Pulmonary Rehabilitation (mPR): Cross-Sectional Survey and Interviews.

Rosie Dobson, Pauline Herbst, Sarah Candy, Tamzin Brott, Jeffrey Garrett, Gayl Humphrey, Julie Reeve, Merryn Tawhai, Denise Taylor, Jim Warren and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rosie DobsonNational Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0122-1000
Pauline HerbstWaitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1029-970X
Sarah CandyCounties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2393-5979
Tamzin BrottWaitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1733-5627
Jeffrey GarrettCounties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9679-9272
Gayl HumphreyNational Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2837-5707
Julie ReeveSchool of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8234-3119
Merryn TawhaiAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3211-6337
Denise TaylorSchool of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0955-5702
Jim WarrenSchool of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8660-8951
Robyn WhittakerNational Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0901-9149
University of Auckland · NZAuckland University of Technology · NZCounties Manukau District Health Board · NZWaitemata District Health Board · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an effective intervention for the management of people with chronic respiratory diseases, but the uptake of and adherence to PR programs is low. There is potential for mobile health (mHealth) to provide an alternative modality for the delivery of PR, overcoming many of the barriers contributing to poor attendance to current services.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to understand the needs, preferences, and priorities of end users for the development of an adaptive mobile PR (mPR) support program.

methodsA mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) approach was used to assess the needs, preferences, and priorities of the end users (ie, patients with chronic respiratory disorders) and key stakeholders (ie, clinicians working with patients with chronic respiratory disorders and running PR). The formative studies included the following: (1) a survey to understand the preferences and priorities of patients for PR and how mobile technology could be used to provide PR support, (2) ethnographic semistructured interviews with patients with chronic respiratory disorders to gain perspectives on their understanding of their health and potential features that could be included in an mPR program, and (3) key informant interviews with health care providers to understand the needs, preferences, and priorities for the development of an mPR support program.

resultsAcross all formative studies (patient survey, n=30; patient interviews, n=8; and key stakeholder interviews, n=8), the participants were positive about the idea of an mPR program but raised concerns related to digital literacy and confidence in using technology, access to technology, and loss of social support currently gained from traditional programs. Key stakeholders highlighted the need for patient safety to be maintained and ensuring appropriate programs for different groups within the population. Finding a balance between ensuring safety and maximizing access was seen to be essential in the success of an mPR program.

conclusionsThese formative studies found high interest in mHealth-based PR intervention and detailed the potential for an mPR program to overcome current barriers to accessing traditional PR programs. Key considerations and features were identified, including the importance of technology access and digital literacy being considered in utilizing technology with this population.

Indexed as

COPDmHealthrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID31859681
PMCPMC6942186
OpenAlexW2977610409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.