Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31859672›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2019

Digital Alerting and Outcomes in Patients With Sepsis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Meera Joshi, Hutan Ashrafian, Sonal Arora, Sadia Khan, Graham Cooke, Ara Darzi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Clinical Informatics in Critical Care Medicine.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meera Joshi *Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4417-1437
Hutan AshrafianDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1668-0672
Sonal AroraChelsea and Westminster Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8345-9049
Sadia KhanChelsea and Westminster Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0154-1776
Graham CookeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6475-5056
Ara DarziDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7815-7989
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis and management of sepsis remain a global health care challenge. Digital technologies have the potential to improve sepsis care.

objectiveThe aim of this paper was to systematically review the evidence on the impact of digital alerting systems on sepsis related outcomes.

methodsThe following databases were searched for studies published from April 1964 to February 12, 2019, with no language restriction: EMBASE, MEDLINE, HMIC, PsycINFO, and Cochrane. All full-text reports of studies identified as potentially eligible after title and abstract reviews were obtained for further review. The search was limited to adult inpatients. Relevant articles were hand searched for other studies. Only studies with clear pre- and postalerting phases were included. Primary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and intensive care LOS, whereas secondary outcomes were time to antibiotics and mortality. Studies based solely on intensive care, case reports, narrative reviews, editorials, and commentaries were excluded. All other trial designs were included. A qualitative assessment and meta-analysis were performed.

resultsThis review identified 72 full-text articles. From these, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Of these, 8 studies reviewed hospital LOS, 12 reviewed mortality outcomes, 5 studies explored time to antibiotics, and 5 studies investigated intensive care unit (ICU) LOS. Both quantitative and qualitative assessments of the studies were performed. There was evidence of a significant benefit of digital alerting in hospital LOS, which reduced by 1.31 days (P=.014), and ICU LOS, which reduced by 0.766 days (P=.007). There was no significant association between digital alerts and mortality (mean decrease 11.4%; P=.77) or time to antibiotics (mean decrease 126 min; P=.13).

conclusionsThis review highlights that digital alerts can considerably reduce hospital and ICU stay for patients with sepsis. Further studies including randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings and identify the choice of alerting system according to the patient status and pathological cohort.

Indexed as

AdultCritical IllnessElectronic Health RecordsHumansSepsisTreatment Outcomediagnosiselectronic health records, sepsismedical order entry systems, outcome assessment (health care)

Identifiers

PMID31859672
PMCPMC6942184
OpenAlexW2978693933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.