Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31859593›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020

Association of cognitive biases with human papillomavirus vaccine hesitancy: a cross-sectional study.

Tiffany D Pomares, Alison M Buttenheim, Avnika B Amin, Caroline M Joyce, Rachael M Porter, Robert A Bednarczyk, Saad B Omer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tiffany D PomaresDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Alison M ButtenheimDepartment of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Avnika B AminDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2212-2546
Caroline M JoyceDepartment of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4798-9488
Rachael M PorterDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6632-4038
Robert A BednarczykDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Saad B OmerYale School of Medicine, Yale Institute for Global Health, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the link between vaccine hesitancy and vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks, it is critical to examine the cognitive processes that contribute to the development of vaccine hesitancy, especially among parents of adolescents. We conducted a secondary analysis of baseline data from a two-phase randomized trial on human papillomavirus to investigate how vaccine hesitancy and intent to vaccinate are associated with six decision-making factors: base rate neglect, conjunction fallacy, sunk cost bias, present bias, risk aversion, and information avoidance. We recruited 1,413 adults residing in the United States with at least one daughter aged 9-17 years old through an online survey on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Vaccine hesitancy, intent to vaccinate, and susceptibility to cognitive biases was measured through a series of brief questionnaires. 1,400 participants were in the final analyzed sample. Most participants were white (74.1%), female (71.6%), married (75.3%), and had a college or graduate/professional education (88.8%). Conjunction fallacy, sunk cost bias, information avoidance, and present bias may be associated with vaccine hesitancy. Intent to vaccinate may be associated with information avoidance. These results suggest that cognitive biases play a role in developing parental vaccine hesitancy and vaccine-related behavior.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentAdultBiasChildCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareUnited StatesVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccinesadolescentcognitive biasheuristicsHPVvaccine hesitancyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID31859593
PMCPMC7227686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.