Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31858954›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology spectrum2019

Pneumococcal Vaccines.

D E Briles, J C Paton, R Mukerji, E Swiatlo, M J Crain

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology spectrum, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. [Analysis of the clustering ofZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Pneumococcal vaccines in China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. O-antigen polysaccharides inMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. [Pneumococcal sepsis 2015-2022: considerations on vaccination strategies].Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

D E BrilesDepartment of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
J C PatonResearch Centre for Infectious Diseases, Department of Molecular and Biomedical Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
R MukerjiDepartment of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
E SwiatloSection of Infectious Diseases, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, LA.
M J CrainDepartment of Pediatrics and Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USSoutheast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System · USUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsHumansPneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesStreptococcus pneumoniaeBacterial ProteinsPneumococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID31858954
PMCPMC10921951
OpenAlexW4211195768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.