Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31858933›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2020

Identification and frequency of consumption of wild edible plants over a year in central Tunisia: a mixed-methods approach.

Marie Claude Dop, Fayçal Kefi, Olfa Karous, Eric O Verger, Asma Bahrini, Zeineb Ghrabi, Jalila El Ati, Gina Kennedy, Céline Termote, MEDINA Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. TunisianPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Wild edible plants traditionally collected and used in southern Yemen.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marie Claude DopNUTRIPASS, IRD, University of Montpellier, Montpellier SupAgro, 911 av. Agropolis, BP64501, F34394 Montpellier, France.
Fayçal KefiCIHEAM-IAMM, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Olfa KarousUniversity of Carthage, INAT (National Agronomy Institute of Tunis), Tunis, Tunisia.
Eric O VergerNUTRIPASS, IRD, University of Montpellier, Montpellier SupAgro, 911 av. Agropolis, BP64501, F34394 Montpellier, France.
Asma BahriniSURVEN (Nutrition Surveillance and Epidemiology in Tunisia) Research Laboratory, INNTA (National Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology), Tunis, Tunisia.
Zeineb GhrabiUniversity of Carthage, INAT (National Agronomy Institute of Tunis), Tunis, Tunisia.
Jalila El AtiSURVEN (Nutrition Surveillance and Epidemiology in Tunisia) Research Laboratory, INNTA (National Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology), Tunis, Tunisia.
Gina KennedyBioversity International, Rome, Italy.
Céline TermoteBioversity International Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-3217-0226
MEDINA Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify wild plants used as food and assess their frequency of consumption over a year in a region of Tunisia where agriculture is undergoing a major transformation from smallholder farming to an intensive high-input agricultural system.

designQualitative ethnobotanical study followed by a survey of women's frequency of consumption of wild plants conducted using FFQ at quarterly intervals.

settingSidi Bouzid governorate of central Tunisia.

participantsMixed-gender group of key informants (n 14) and focus group participants (n 43). Survey sample of women aged 20-49 years, representative at governorate level (n 584).

resultsEthnobotanical study: thirty folk species of wild edible plants corresponding to thirty-five taxa were identified by key informants, while twenty folk species (twenty-five taxa) were described by focus groups as commonly eaten. Population-based survey: 98 % of women had consumed a wild plant over the year, with a median frequency of 2 d/month. Wild and semi-domesticated fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill. and Anethum graveolens) was the most frequently consumed folk species. Women in the upper tertile of wild plant consumption frequency were more likely to be in their 30s, to live in an urban area, to have non-monetary access to foods from their extended family and to belong to wealthier households.

conclusionsIn this population, wild edible plants, predominantly leafy vegetables, are appreciated but consumed infrequently. Their favourable perception, however, offers an opportunity for promoting their consumption which could play a role in providing healthy diets and mitigating the obesity epidemic that is affecting the Tunisian population.

Indexed as

EthnobotanyFeeding BehaviorPlants, EdibleAdultDietFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNutritional StatusNutritive ValueSurveys and QuestionnairesTunisiaVegetablesYoung AdultConsumptionEthnobotanyFFQNutritionTunisiaWild edible plants

Identifiers

PMID31858933
PMCPMC10200578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.