Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31858763›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2020

Genetic Counseling Status and Perspectives Based on a 2018 Professional Survey in Korea.

Jieun Kim, Sun Young Kong, Sung Hee Han, Jong Won Kim, Chang Ho Jeon, Jongha Yoo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jieun KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sun Young KongDepartment of Cancer Biomedical Science, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0620-4058
Sung Hee HanBioCore Co. Ltd., Division of Biotechnology, Yongin, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7058-9952
Jong Won KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0708-9242
Chang Ho JeonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Daegu Catholic Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-7117
Jongha YooDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Health Insurance Service, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea. jhyooken@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8294-0543
Soonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul · KRDaegu Catholic University Medical Center · KRNational Cancer Center · KRNational Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic counseling (GC) provides many benefits, including the identification of patients appropriate for testing, patient education, and medical management. We evaluated the current status of and challenges faced by GC practitioners in Korean hospitals.

methodsAn electronic survey was designed and conducted in 52 certified laboratory physicians belonging to the Korean Society of Laboratory Medicine, from August to September 2018. The questionnaires addressed three main categories of information: (1) current status of GC in hospitals; (2) essential qualifications of GC practitioners; and (3) challenges and perspectives for GC. Fisher's exact test was applied to analyze categorical data.

resultsAmong a total of 52 participants who initially responded, 12 (23.1%) were performing GC either by direct or indirect care. GC clinics were opened regularly for one (33.3%) or more than three sessions (25.0%) per week; most respondents spent more time for pre-visit activities than in-person visits, both for a initial visit patient and for a follow-up visit patient. All laboratory physicians provided genetic information to their patients. Most recommended family genetic testing when indicated (91.7%), discussed disease management (75.0%), and/or ordered additional genetic testing (58.3%), and some referred patients to other specialists (8.3%).

conclusionsBoth patients and laboratory physicians concede the advantage of GC performed by clinical geneticists; however, the practice of GC involves several challenges and raises some concerns. The cost and support required to implement GC need to be addressed in order to provide qualified GC in Korea.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic TestingHumansPhysiciansRepublic of KoreaSocieties, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesGenetic counselingGenetic testingLaboratory physicianSurvey

Identifiers

PMID31858763
PMCPMC6933060
OpenAlexW2995673538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.