Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31858709›Full record

ReviewThe FEBS journal2020

How enzyme promiscuity and horizontal gene transfer contribute to metabolic innovation.

Margaret E Glasner, Dat P Truong, Benjamin C Morse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The FEBS journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Evolution and diversification of carboxylesterase-like [4+2] cyclases in aspidosperma and iboga alkaloid biosynthesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Quantifying microbial guilds.ISME communications · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margaret E GlasnerDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1818-1965
Dat P TruongDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1248-1369
Benjamin C MorseDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3271-1056

Funding

Biophysical constraints on evolution of enzyme specificityR01GM124409 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI GLASNER, MARGARET E · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promiscuity is the coincidental ability of an enzyme to catalyze its native reaction and additional reactions that are not biological functions in the same active site. Promiscuity plays a central role in enzyme evolution and is thus a useful property for protein and metabolic engineering. This review examines enzyme evolution holistically, beginning with evaluating biochemical support for four enzyme evolution models. As expected, there is strong biochemical support for the subfunctionalization and innovation-amplification-divergence models, in which promiscuity is a central feature. In many cases, however, enzyme evolution is more complex than the models indicate, suggesting much is yet to be learned about selective pressures on enzyme function. A complete understanding of enzyme evolution must also explain the ability of metabolic networks to integrate new enzyme activities. Hidden within metabolic networks are underground metabolic pathways constructed from promiscuous activities. We discuss efforts to determine the diversity and pervasiveness of underground metabolism. Remarkably, several studies have discovered that some metabolic defects can be repaired via multiple underground routes. In prokaryotes, metabolic innovation is driven by connecting enzymes acquired by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) into the metabolic network. Thus, we end the review by discussing how the combination of promiscuity and HGT contribute to evolution of metabolism in prokaryotes. Future studies investigating the contribution of promiscuity to enzyme and metabolic evolution will need to integrate deeper probes into the influence of evolution on protein biophysics, enzymology, and metabolism with more complex and realistic evolutionary models. ENZYMES: lactate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.27), malate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.37), OSBS (EC 4.2.1.113), HisA (EC 5.3.1.16), TrpF, PriA (EC 5.3.1.24), R-mandelonitrile lyase (EC 4.1.2.10), Maleylacetate reductase (EC 1.3.1.32).

Indexed as

Gene Transfer, HorizontalAldehyde-LyasesOxidoreductasesOxidoreductases Acting on CH-CH Group DonorsSubstrate SpecificityAldehyde-Lyasesmaleylacetate reductasemandelonitrile lyaseOxidoreductasesOxidoreductases Acting on CH-CH Group Donorscatalytic promiscuityenzyme evolutioninnovation-amplification-divergencemetabolic pathway evolutionneofunctionalizationsubfunctionalizationsubstrate promiscuityunderground metabolism

Identifiers

PMID31858709
PMCPMC7245361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.