Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31858677›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2020

Reflection in practice: How can patient experience feedback trigger staff reflection in hospital acute care settings?

Jennifer Jones, Julian Bion, Celia Brown, Janet Willars, Olivia Brookes, Carolyn Tarrant, PEARL collaboration

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nursing Students and Nurses' Recommendations Aiming at Improving the Development of the Humanistic Caring Competency.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reflection in practice: How can patient experience feedback trigger staff reflection in hospital acute care settings?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer JonesHealth Sciences department, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Julian BionIntensive Care Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Celia BrownWarwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
Janet WillarsHealth Sciences department, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Olivia BrookesResearch Development and Innovation, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Carolyn TarrantHealth Sciences department, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7356-5342
PEARL collaboration
University of Leicester · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health 14/156/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and staff experiences provide important insights into care quality, but health systems have difficulty using these data to improve care. Little attention has been paid to understanding how patient experience feedback can act as a prompt to reflection in practice in the clinical setting.

objectiveWe aimed to identify the ways in which different types of patient experience feedback act as a trigger or prompt for engagement in reflection in clinical practice in acute hospital settings and identify important considerations for enhancing the value of patient experience data for reflective learning.

methodsWe conducted an ethnographic study in eight acute care units in three NHS hospital trusts in England, including 140 hours of observations and 45 semi-structured interviews with nursing, medical and managerial staff working in acute medical units and intensive care units. The data were analysed thematically.

findingsWe distinguished between formal patient experience data sources: data purposively collected and collated to capture the patient experience of care, generally at organizational level, including surveys, complaints and comments; and informal sources of feedback on the patient experience recognized by staff alongside the formal data. We also identified patient narratives as an 'in between' source of data. The impact of different types of patient feedback in triggering reflection primarily depended on the extent to which the feedback was experienced as personally relevant, meaningful and emotionally salient. DISCUSSION: Patient experience feedback is multi-faceted, but our study suggests that all types of feedback could be harnessed more effectively to prompt reflection.

Indexed as

HospitalsQuality of Health CareCritical CareFeedbackHumansPatient Outcome Assessmentacute carepatient experiencestaff reflection

Identifiers

PMID31858677
PMCPMC7104653
OpenAlexW2995772962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.