Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31858436›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2020

Less is more: Morphometric and psychological differences between low and high reappraisers.

Edoardo Pappaianni, Nicola De Pisapia, Roma Siugzdaite, Cristiano Crescentini, Antonio Calcagnì, Remo Job, Alessandro Grecucci

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Edoardo PappaianniDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy. edoardo.pappaianni@unitn.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8961-1956
Nicola De PisapiaDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Roma SiugzdaiteMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Cristiano CrescentiniDepartment of Languages and Literature, Communication, Education and Society, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Antonio CalcagnìDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Remo JobDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Alessandro GrecucciDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
University of Trento · ITMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A060_1103Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion regulation plays a crucial role in an individual's well-being, as it is known that deficits in regulating emotions can lead to psychological and psychiatric disorders. Cognitive reappraisal is widely considered to be an adaptive and effective emotion-regulation strategy. People are more or less able to apply it, but it is still not clear how reappraisal affects brain structures and the psychological profile of individuals. In our study we thus aimed to explore the impact of applying reappraisal at both the neural and the psychological level. Source-based morphometry (SBM), a whole-brain multivariate method based on the Independent Component Analysis that extracts patterns of covariation of gray matter ("independent networks"), was applied to the MRI images of 37 participants. In order to enrich their psychological profiles, we measured their experienced affectivity (PANAS) and their empathic abilities (IRI). Based on the frequency of applying reappraisal (ERQ), participants were divided into low and high reappraisers (18 vs. 19). An independent source of gray matter emerged as being different between the groups: specifically, low reappraisers showed more gray matter volume concentration in a network including the frontal, temporal, and parietal regions as compared to high reappraisers. At the psychological level, low reappraisers reported a more strongly experienced negative affect, while no difference among reappraisers emerged with regard to empathic abilities. Capitalizing on a multivariate method for structural analysis that is innovative in this field, this study extends previous observations on individual differences in the ability to regulate emotions, and it describes a plausible impact of reappraisal on brain structures and affectivity.

Indexed as

IndividualityAdultBrainCognitionEmotionsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetAffectivityEmotion regulationMorphometryMultivariateReappraisal

Identifiers

PMID31858436
PMCPMC7613187
OpenAlexW2996706456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.