ArticleLasers in medical science2020
Exploration of day-surgery photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in Chinese population.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patients' experiences and needs of undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in the surgical process: a qualitative study.BMC urology · 2025Article
- The feasibility and safety of photoselective vaporization for prostate using a 180-W XPS Greenlight laser in day-surgery pattern in China.Lasers in medical science · 2021Article
- Retrospective analysis of the changes in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia during an 11-year period: a single-center experience.Asian journal of andrologyArticle
- Enhanced recovery after surgery in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia.Asian journal of andrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the surgical effect and cost-effectiveness of day surgery versus inpatient surgery for photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in Chinese population. We retrospectively collected 240 patients undergoing day-surgery PVP (April 2016 to March 2018) and 156 patients undergoing inpatient-surgery PVP (May 2014 to March 2016). Differences between groups in demographics, perioperative outcomes, complications, and postoperative changes were calculated. Economical results in terms of hospital stay and relevant preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative cost were evaluated. There was no significant difference in operative time, incidence of postoperative complications, and other functional outcomes between two groups (P > 0.05), but the waiting time for admission and the hospital cost including the drug charges, bed fee, nursing fee, laboratory test, and imaging fee of day-surgery group were significantly lower than that of inpatient-surgery group (P < 0.05). Day surgery of PVP has firm and well accepted position in ambulatory surgery of urology. It could significantly reduce the waiting time for admission and hospitalization costs in BPH patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.