Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31858231›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2020

Comparison of prognosis between observation and surgical resection groups with small sporadic non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms without distant metastasis.

Yusuke Kurita, Kazuo Hara, Takamichi Kuwahara, Nobumasa Mizuno, Nozomi Okuno, Shin Haba, Masataka Okuno, Seiji Natsume, Yoshiki Senda, Kensuke Kubota and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuke KuritaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Kazuo HaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan. khara@aichi-cc.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4699-6136
Takamichi KuwaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Nobumasa MizunoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Nozomi OkunoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Shin HabaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8681, Japan.
Masataka OkunoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Seiji NatsumeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshiki SendaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Kensuke KubotaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Atsushi NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Yasumasa NiwaDepartment of Endoscopy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasuhiro ShimizuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Aichi Cancer Center · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of small (≤ 2 cm), sporadic localized non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) is often controversial. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes with observation and surgical resection in small PNENs.

methodsSeventy-five patients with small localized sporadic non-functional PNENs ≤ 2 cm, who underwent observation or surgical resection, were retrospectively reviewed. Changes in tumor size during follow-up in the observation group were also investigated.

resultsThe median age of the cohort was 61 (range 35-81) years. The tumor grades were G1, G2, and unknown, in 61 (81.3%), 8 (10.7%), and 6 (8.0%) patients, respectively. The mean follow-up periods in the observation (n = 23) and surgical resection groups (n = 52) were 52.3 (range 6.8-133.3) months and 73.0 (range 9.1-179.9) months, respectively. The median overall survival was not reached. During follow-up, no patient died of PNENs, two died of other diseases, three had lymph node metastases, and one experienced recurrence after surgical resection. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the observation and surgical resection groups (hazard ratio: 0.031, P = 0.417). The mean change in tumor size in the observation group was + 0.30 mm (range - 1.6 to + 3.0 mm). No deaths, tumor progression, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, or recurrence were noted in patients with PNENs ≤ 1 cm (n = 36).

conclusionsThe prognosis of small localized PNENs is good. Observation may be an alternative to surgery in high-risk patients and those with small G1 tumors, particularly those measuring ≤ 1 cm.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisObservationPancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasmsSmall tumorsSurgery

Identifiers

PMID31858231
OpenAlexW2995830932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.