Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31858199›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2020

Network meta-analysis of knee outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with various types of tendon grafts.

Xiong-Gang Yang, Feng Wang, Xin He, Jiang-Tao Feng, Yong-Cheng Hu, Hao Zhang, Li Yang, Kunchi Hua

Abstract readReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Optimal Surgical Treatment Method for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. [Mid-term effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament revision].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiong-Gang YangGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Feng WangGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Xin HeDepartment of Bone Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, 406 Jiefang Southern Road, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Jiang-Tao FengGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Yong-Cheng HuDepartment of Bone Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, 406 Jiefang Southern Road, Tianjin, 300211, China. huycdoctor@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9846-6735
Hao ZhangGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Li YangGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Kunchi HuaGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Tianjin Medical University · CNTianjin Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVarious grafts were selected for restoring knee stability and regaining pre-injury activity levels after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. This review aimed to compare the short-term knee outcomes of different tendon grafts for primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

methodsDatabases of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were retrieved for identifying the published RCT comparing the short-term (≤ 2 years) knee outcomes of different tendon grafts for ACLR. The main outcomes include the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective scores, side-to-side difference on knee laxity, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm score, Tegner score, all recorded complications and graft re-ruptures.

resultsA total of 32 trials involving 2962 patients and 17 grafts were included. Superior IKDC subjective score was found for quadriceps tendon autograft (QTB) when compared with autografts including bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), four-strand hamstring tendon (4S-HT), and double-bundle HT. The 4S-HT autograft was associated with poorer anteroposterior and rotational knee stability than the BPTB autograft. Artificial ligament also was found to provide lower knee stability compared with the autografts including the BPTB, patellar tendon, 4S-HT, 4S-HT with preserved tibial insertion, 6S-HT, and four-strand semitendinosus tendon. Additionally, the BPTB allograft showed a statistically higher knee laxity than 6S-HT allograft, while no difference was found between the genuine autografts and non-irradiated allografts.

conclusionsQTB was recommended to be used even over the BPTB and 4S-HT autografts. BPTB autograft was more effective on restoring the knee stability than 4S-HT autograft. Non-irradiated allografts could be safely used as alternatives to autografts. However, artificial ligaments were not recommended for primary ACLR for significantly increased risk of knee laxity.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAutograftsHumansKneeKnee JointProstheses and ImplantsRuptureTendonsTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation, HomologousTreatment OutcomeAnterior cruciate ligamentArtificial ligamentKnee functionKnee stabilityTendon allograftTendon autograft

Identifiers

PMID31858199
OpenAlexW2996676153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.