ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2020
Euclidean distances of laryngopharyngeal structures obtained from CT data for preclinical development of laryngoscopic devices.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Droplet applicator module for reproducible and controlled endoscopic laryngeal adductor reflex stimulation.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to determine Euclidean distances between landmark structures in the larynx and pharynx to optimize endoscope shaft designs with regard to gentle and patient-oriented handling.
methodsFour Euclidean distances between landmarks in the larynx and pharynx were analyzed based on CT data of 66 patients. Distance (1): labium inferius oris-posterior pharyngeal wall at the cervical vertebra C1 (atlas), anterior edge of the tuberculum anterius atlantis. Distance (2): posterior pharyngeal wall adjacent to C1-entrance of pyriform sinus. Distance (3): inferior edge of the uvula-superior edge of the epiglottis. Distance (4): base of the vallecula-posterior pharyngeal wall. The minimum angular field of view α required to observe the glottis with a rigid transoral laryngoscope was derived trigonometrically from distances (2) and (4).
resultsAverage Euclidean distances measured: Distance (1): 90.7 mm ± 6.9 mm in men and 86.9 mm ± 5.9 mm in women. (2): 73.7 mm ± 13.4 mm and 56.2 mm ± 7.6 mm. (3): 25.2 mm ± 8.6 mm and 18.5 mm ± 6.8 mm. (4): 20.8 mm ± 4.6 mm and 16.5 mm ± 3.4 mm. α: 16.0° ± 3.9° and 16.6 ± 4.3°.
conclusionsAs expected, statistically significant sex-related differences could be observed for distances (1)-(4). The results indicate that the length of transoral laryngoscopes should not be below 110 mm and that a minimum angular field of view of α = 17° is required to fully observe the laryngeal inlet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.