Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31858127›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental entomology2020

Impact of Diflubenzuron on Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Microcolony Development.

A A Camp, M A Batres, W C Williams, D M Lehmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental entomology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The role of the veterinary diagnostic toxicologist in apiary health.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2023
    Article
  3. Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A A CampORISE Researcher, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Research Triangle Park, NC.
M A BatresOak Ridge Associated Universities, Research Triangle Park, NC.
W C WilliamsCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), Public Health & Integrated Toxicology Division, Cardiopulmonary and Immunotoxicology Branch, US Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Drop B105-02, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC.
D M LehmannCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), Public Health & Environmental Systems Division, Exposure Indicators Branch, US Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Drop B105-02, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Environmental Protection Agency · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliance on the honey bee as a surrogate organism for risk assessment performed on other bees is widely challenged due to differences in phenology, life history, and sensitivity to pesticides between bee species. Consequently, there is a need to develop validated methods for assessing toxicity in non-Apis bees including bumble bees. The usefulness of small-scale, queenless colonies, termed microcolonies, has not been fully investigated for hazard assessment. Using the insect growth regulator diflubenzuron as a reference toxicant, we monitored microcolony development from egg laying to drone emergence using the Eastern bumble bee Bombus impatiens (C.), a non-Apis species native to North America. Microcolonies were monitored following dietary exposure to diflubenzuron (nominal concentrations: 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 1,000 µg/liter). Microcolony syrup and pollen consumption was significantly reduced by diflubenzuron exposure. Pupal cell production was also significantly decreased at the highest diflubenzuron concentration assessed. Ultimately, diflubenzuron inhibited drone production in a concentration-dependent manner and a 42-d 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined. None of the dietary concentrations of diflubenzuron tested affected adult worker survival, or average drone weight. These data strengthen the foundation for use of this methodology, and provide valuable information for B. impatiens; however, more work is required to better understand the utility of the bumble bee microcolony model for pesticide hazard assessment.

Indexed as

DiflubenzuronHymenopteraPesticidesAnimalsBeesNorth AmericaPollenDiflubenzuronPesticidesbumble beeinsect growth regulatormicrocolonypesticiderisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID31858127
PMCPMC7400686
OpenAlexW2996073778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.