Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31858042›Full record

ArticleACS omega2019

Efficient Bayesian Function Optimization of Evolving Material Manufacturing Processes.

David Rubín de Celis Leal, Dang Nguyen, Pratibha Vellanki, Cheng Li, Santu Rana, Nathan Thompson, Sunil Gupta, Keiran Pringle, Surya Subianto, Svetha Venkatesh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

David Rubín de Celis LealApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Dang NguyenApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Pratibha VellankiApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Cheng LiApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Santu RanaApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Nathan ThompsonApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Sunil GuptaApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Keiran PringleApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Surya SubiantoApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Svetha VenkateshApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Teo SlezakApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Murray HeightHeiQ Australia, Pty Ltd, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Alessandra SuttiApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute (AI) and Institute for Frontier Materials (IFM), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scale-up of laboratory procedures to industrial production is the main challenge standing between ideation and the successful introduction of novel materials into commercial products. Retaining quality while ensuring high per-batch production yields is the main challenge. Batch processing and other dynamic strategies that preserve product quality can be applied, but they typically involve a variety of experimental parameters and functions that are difficult to optimize because of interdependencies that are often antagonistic. Adaptive Bayesian optimization is demonstrated here as a valuable support tool in increasing both the per-batch yield and quality of short polymer fibers, produced by wet spinning and shear dispersion methods. Through this approach, it is shown that short fiber dispersions with high yield and a specified, targeted fiber length distribution can be obtained with minimal cost of optimization, starting from sub-optimal processing conditions and minimal prior knowledge. The Bayesian function optimization demonstrated here for batch processing could be applied to other dynamic scale-up methods as well as to cases presenting higher dimensional challenges such as shape and structure optimization. This work shows the great potential of synergies between industrial processing, material engineering, and machine learning perspectives.

Identifiers

PMID31858042
PMCPMC6906790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.