ArticleHuman reproduction open2019
C-reactive protein as a marker of persistent
Article in Human reproduction open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preconception Chlamydia trachomatis seropositivity and fecundability, live birth, and adverse pregnancy outcomes.Fertility and sterility · 2025Trial
- Differential Impact of Metabolic Factors and Comorbidities on Peripheral Neuropathy.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025Article
- C-Reactive Protein: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, False Test Results and a Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Clinicians.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionDoes C-reactive protein (CRP), as a marker of persisting low-grade inflammation, identify SUMMARY ANSWER: No association was found between slightly elevated CRP (seCRP) levels and TFI in our CAT-positive patient population. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In the fertility work-up, CAT is used to estimate the risk for TFI and to select high-risk patients for additional invasive diagnostic procedures (e.g. hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy). However, a high number of false positives exist among CAT-positive patients. In a previous study, it has been suggested that women with TFI may be identified more accurately when combining CAT with CRP, a marker for persistent low-grade inflammation. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: Our original retrospective cohort consisted of 887 consecutive female patients who visited the fertility clinic of a tertiary care centre between 2007 and 2015. All CAT-positive women who underwent laparoscopy (as the reference test for evaluation of tubal function) and who had not undergone previous pelvic surgery were included in the study. CRP was determined in spare serum samples, and medical data was obtained by chart review. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsA total of 101 women (11.4%) were CAT-positive, and 64 of these 101 women (7.2%) met all inclusion criteria. CAT was performed with an ELISA. TFI was assessed by laparoscopy and strictly defined as extensive peri-adnexal adhesions and/or distal occlusion of at least one tube. In spare sera, CRP was performed with a high-sensitivity CRP ELISA, and CRP levels between 3 and 10 mg/L were defined as positive. Analyses were corrected for BMI, endometriosis and smoking. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was no statistically significant association between seCRP level and TFI after adjusting for BMI, endometriosis and smoking (odds ratio 1.0; 95% CI 0.3-3.3; LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our retrospective study had a small sample size due to a low CAT-positivity rate and a conservative clinical policy with regard to invasive diagnostic testing. Additionally, CRP levels were only measured once, while they may change throughout the menstrual cycle and in time. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsContrary to previous findings, our results show CRP is not suitable as a marker of persistent low-grade inflammation in CAT-positive women. Other inflammatory markers and immunogenetic host factors should be studied on their clinical validity and utility to improve non-invasive risk assessment for TFI in the fertility work-up. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was partially supported by the European EuroTrans-Bio Grant [Reference number 110012 ETB] and the Eurostars grant (E!9372). S.A.M., a full-time employee of Amsterdam University Medical Centres location VUMC (0.56 fte) and the Maastricht University Medical Center (0.44 fte), is the founder (2011) and CEO of TubaScan Ltd, a spin-off company, Dept. of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. S.O. and E.F.v.E. at the time of conducting this research had a partial appointment at TubaScan Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.