Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31857994›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2019

Tumour growth rate as a tool for response evaluation during PD-1 treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis.

Deirdre M H J Ten Berge, Daniel P Hurkmans, Ilse den Besten, Jeroen S Kloover, Ron H J Mathijssen, Reno Debets, Egbert F Smit, Joachim G J V Aerts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Deirdre M H J Ten BergeDept of Radiology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Daniel P HurkmansDept of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8750-5188
Ilse den BestenDept of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen S KlooverDept of Pulmonary Diseases, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenDept of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Reno DebetsDept of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Egbert F SmitNetherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joachim G J V AertsDept of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a standard of care treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To get insight into variations in tumour growth kinetics and their potential predictive values for outcome, we evaluated tumour growth rate (TGR) in patients receiving programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors. PATIENTS AND

methodsDifferences in TGR before and after the start of treatment were calculated by entering the sum of the longest diameters from computer tomography scans before and after the initiation of therapy into a formula that assumes volumetric exponential tumour growth. TGR variations, possible predictors for TGR changes and its relationship to overall survival (OS) were studied. For comparison, tumour response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1.

resultsAmong the 58 evaluable patients, 37 patients (64%) showed deceleration of TGR and 16 patients (27%) showed an acceleration of TGR after initiation of therapy, with a significant difference in median OS of 18.0 months

conclusionTumour growth kinetics can be used as a clinically relevant predictor for OS in anti-PD-1-treated patients with NSCLC, and may provide additional information to RECIST measurements.

Identifiers

PMID31857994
PMCPMC6911925
OpenAlexW2995309649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.