ArticleOncology reviews2019
Efficacy and safety profiles of programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: A comprehensive systematic review.
Article in Oncology reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation between UGT1A1 polymorphism and efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan in Chinese cancer patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Combined atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis on their efficacy and safety.BMC cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Does immune checkpoint inhibitor increase the risks of poor outcomes in COVID-19-infected cancer patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of Adverse Reactions Caused by Olaparib for Different Indications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Chemotherapy Combined With Immunotherapy as a First-Line Treatment Brings Benefits to Patients With Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma but Different Risks of Adverse Reactions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Survival Prediction of Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Olaparib in the Treatment of Recurrent Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of Concomitant Antibiotics Use on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy in Cancer Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Review
- The role of NETosis in breast cancer: mechanistic insights and biomarker potential.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Review
- Therapeutic innovations in triple negative breast cancer: integrating molecular targeting and monoclonal antibody strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor - Related Adverse Events and Their Management in Breast Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2024Review
- Simultaneous glutamine metabolism and PD-L1 inhibition to enhance suppression of triple-negative breast cancer.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Article
- The developing landscape of combinatorial therapies of immune checkpoint blockade with DNA damage repair inhibitors for the treatment of breast and ovarian cancers.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2021Review
- HLA-G gene editing in tumor cell lines as a novel alternative in cancer immunotherapy.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with worse prognosis, with limited treatment regiments available and higher mortality rate. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) showed great potentials in treating malignancies and may serve as potential therapies for TNBC. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of TNBC. Literature search was performed via PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases, selecting studies which evaluated the use of anti-PD-1/PDL1 for TNBC from inception until February 2019. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Overall, 7 studies evaluating outcomes of 1395 patients with TNBC were included in this systematic review. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 showed significant antitumor effect, proven by their promising response (objective response rate (ORR), 18.5-39.4%) and survival rates (median overall survival (OS), 9.2-21.3 months). Moreover, anti- PD-1/PD-L1 yielded better outcomes when given as first-line therapy, and overexpression of PD-L1 in tumors showed better therapeutic effects. On the other hands, safety profiles were similar across agents and generally acceptable, with grade ≥3 treatment- related adverse effects (AEs) ranging from 9.5% to 15.6% and no new AEs were experienced by TNBC patients. Most grade ≥3 AEs are immune-mediated, which are manifested as neutropenia, fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, and anemia. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors showed promising efficacy and tolerable AEs, and thus may benefit TNBC patients. Further studies of randomized controlled trials with larger populations are needed to better confirm the potential of these agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.