ArticleNature reviews. Clinical oncology2020
Correcting the ASCO position on phase I clinical trials in cancer.
Article in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early drug development in solid tumours: analysis of National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase 1 trials.Lancet (London, England) · 2022Article
- Trends in Grade 5 Toxicity and Response in Phase I Trials in Hematologic Malignancy: 20-Year Experience From the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at the National Cancer Institute.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022Article
- Decision-making about clinical trial options among older patients with metastatic cancer who have exhausted standard therapies.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2022Article
- Pattern of Treatment Initiation and Outcomes for Patients With Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Ontario.Cureus · 2022Article
- Reply to 'Correcting the ASCO position on phase I clinical trials in cancer'.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31857691What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.