Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31857685›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

Solid-type adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast, a distinct molecular entity enriched in NOTCH and CREBBP mutations.

Julie Massé, Caroline Truntzer, Romain Boidot, Emmanuel Khalifa, Gaëlle Pérot, Valérie Velasco, Laétitia Mayeur, Claire Billerey-Larmonier, Larry Blanchard, Hélène Charitansky and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Molecular Basis of Breast Tumor Heterogeneity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinicopathologic Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Mammary Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Study.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Julie MasséDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Caroline TruntzerDepartment of Tumor Biology and Pathology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-21000, Dijon, France.
Romain BoidotDepartment of Tumor Biology and Pathology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-21000, Dijon, France.
Emmanuel KhalifaDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Gaëlle PérotINSERM U1037, Cancer Research Center Toulouse (CRCT), F-31000, Toulouse, France.
Valérie VelascoDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Laétitia MayeurDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Claire Billerey-LarmonierDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Larry BlanchardDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Hélène CharitanskyDepartment of Surgical oncology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Isabelle SoubeyranDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Richard IggoUniversity of Bordeaux, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Laurent ArnouldDepartment of Tumor Biology and Pathology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-21000, Dijon, France.
Gaëtan MacGroganDepartment of Biopathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, F-33076, Bordeaux, France. g.macgrogan@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3483-9758
Institut Bergonié · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the breast with a predominant solid pattern is difficult to diagnose with certainty and differentiate from more common triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) of basal-phenotype. To better characterize solid ACC, we performed a clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular comparative analysis of 33 ACCs of the breast comprising 17 solid variant ACCs and 16 conventional ACCs. Solid ACCs displayed basaloid morphology with an exclusive or predominant epithelial cell population associated with decreased myoepithelial differentiation, while demonstrating MYB protein overexpression similar to the more common type of ACC. Strong and diffuse MYB expression by immunochemistry was observed in 14/17 (82%) of solid ACCs while MYB rearrangements were detected by break apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in only 3/16 (19%) of solid ACCs. Conversely, weak MYB immunohistochemical expression was observed in only 7/204 (3%) of TNBC. Solid ACCs displayed a transcriptomic profile distinct from conventional ACCs with 549 genes showing a highly significant differential expression between conventional and solid ACC [false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01; log2FC > |1|]. EnrichR and Kegg Pathway analyses identified PI3K-Akt and focal adhesion signaling pathways as significantly overexpressed in conventional ACCs compared with solid ACCs which significantly overexpressed the nitrogen metabolism pathway. CREBBP mutations and NOTCH activating gene mutations were only present in solid ACCs, concerning 5/16 (31%) of cases for each gene. Tumors with NOTCH activating mutations displayed a strong diffuse nuclear NICD1 staining, an established marker of Notch pathway activation. Solid ACCs also differed from basal-type TNBC, with fewer TP53 mutations and a more stable genomic profile on array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). In summary, solid-type ACC of the breast is a distinct molecular entity within the ACC family and is different from common basal-type TNBC. MYB is a diagnostically useful biomarker of solid ACC and NOTCH could be a novel potential therapeutic target in 30% of cases.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Adenoid CysticCREB-Binding ProteinFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMutationReceptors, NotchRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCREB-Binding ProteinCREBBP protein, humanReceptors, Notch

Identifiers

PMID31857685
OpenAlexW2995632564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.