Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31857629›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Anthropogenic substrate-borne vibrations impact anuran calling.

Valentina Caorsi, Vinicius Guerra, Raíssa Furtado, Diego Llusia, Lívia Roese Miron, Márcio Borges-Martins, Camila Both, Peter M Narins, Sebastiaan W F Meenderink, Rafael Márquez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of natural abiotic soil vibrations, rainfall and wind on anuran calling behavior: a test with captive-bred midwife toads (Alytes obstetricans).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Valentina CaorsiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Dep. de Zoologia, Inst. de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 9500, Porto Alegre, RS, 91540-000, Brazil. valenzc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4166-9600
Vinicius GuerraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Manejo de Recursos Naturais, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Natureza, Universidade Federal do Acre, Rio Branco, AC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1912-1139
Raíssa FurtadoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Dep. de Ecologia, Inst. de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, CP 15007, RS, 91501-970, Brazil.
Diego LlusiaDepartamento de Ecología, Terrestrial Ecology Group, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), C/Darwin 2, E-28049, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Lívia Roese MironCurso de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Avenida Roraima, n 1000, 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Márcio Borges-MartinsPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Dep. de Zoologia, Inst. de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 9500, Porto Alegre, RS, 91540-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9328-5794
Camila BothDepartamento Interdisciplinar, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Campus Litoral Norte, Av. Tramandaí, 976, 95625-000, Imbé, RS, Brazil.
Peter M NarinsDepartments of Integrative Biology & Physiology, and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, 621 Charles E. Young Drive S., Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Sebastiaan W F MeenderinkVA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA, 92357, USA.
Rafael MárquezFonoteca Zoológica. Dept. de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-860X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic disturbance is a major cause of the biodiversity crisis. Nevertheless, the role of anthropogenic substrate vibrations in disrupting animal behavior is poorly understood. Amphibians comprise the terrestrial vertebrates most sensitive to vibrations, and since communication is crucial to their survival and reproduction, they are a suitable model for investigating this timely subject. Playback tests were used to assess the effects of substrate vibrations produced by two sources of anthropogenic activity- road traffic and wind turbines- on the calling activity of a naïve population of terrestrial toads. In their natural habitat, a buried tactile sound transducer was used to emit simulated traffic and wind turbine vibrations, and changes in the toads' acoustic responses were analyzed by measuring parameters important for reproductive success: call rate, call duration and dominant frequency. Our results showed a significant call rate reduction by males of Alytes obstetricans in response to both seismic sources, whereas other parameters remained stable. Since females of several species prefer males with higher call rates, our results suggest that anthropogenically derived substrate-borne vibrations could reduce individual reproductive success. Our study demonstrates a clear negative effect of anthropogenic vibrations on anuran communication, and the urgent need for further investigation in this area.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsAnuraFemaleMaleReproductionSexual Behavior, AnimalVibrationVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID31857629
PMCPMC6923410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.