Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31857371›Full record

Observational studyEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2020

Community emergency medicine: taking the ED to the patient: a 12-month observational analysis of activity and impact of a physician response unit.

Tony Joy, Lisa Ramage, Sophie Mitchinson, Oliver Kirby, Rob Greenhalgh, Danë Goodsman, Gareth Davies

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tony JoyPhysician Response Unit, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, London, UK tonyjoy@nhs.net.
Lisa RamagePhysician Response Unit, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3017-1882
Sophie MitchinsonPhysician Response Unit, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, London, UK.
Oliver KirbyPhysician Response Unit, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, London, UK.
Rob GreenhalghPhysician Response Unit, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, London, UK.
Danë GoodsmanLondon's Air Ambulance, Institute of Pre-Hospital Care, London, UK.
Gareth DaviesPhysician Response Unit, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, London, UK.
Barts Health NHS Trust · GBLondon Ambulance Service NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesInternational and national health policies advocate greater integration of emergency and community care. The Physician Response Unit (PRU) responds to 999 calls 'taking the Emergency Department to the patient'. Operational since 2001, the service was reconfigured in September 2017. This article presents service activity data and implications for the local health economy from the first year since remodelling.

methodsA retrospective descriptive analysis of a prospectively maintained database was undertaken. Data collected included dispatch information, diagnostics and treatments undertaken, diagnosis and disposition. Treating clinical teams recorded judgments whether patients managed in the community would have been (1) conveyed to an emergency department (ED)and (2) admitted to hospital, in the absence of the PRU. Hospital Episode Statistics data and NHS referencing costs were used to estimate the monetary value of PRU activity.

results1924 patients were attended, averaging 5.3 per day. 1289 (67.0%) patients were managed in the community. Based on the opinion of the treating team, 945 (73.3%) would otherwise have been conveyed to hospital, and 126 (9.7%) would subsequently have been admitted. The service was estimated to deliver a reduction of 868 inpatient bed days and generate a net economic benefit of £530 107.

conclusionsThe PRU model provides community emergency medical care and early patient contact with a senior clinical decision-maker. It engages with community providers in order to manage 67.0% of patients in the community. We believe the PRU offers an effective model of community emergency medicine and helps to integrate local emergency and community providers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCommunity Health ServicesEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLondonMaleemergency care systemsprehospital care

Identifiers

PMID31857371
PMCPMC7497571
OpenAlexW2994935636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.