ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020
The Impact of Non-additive Effects on the Genetic Correlation Between Populations.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using deep learning models as a genetic architecture for the simulation of breeding schemes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Survival phenotypes and lipid metabolic responses to DHAV-3 infection in Pekin duck hybrids with differential resistance.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Genetic parameters via predictivity in large populations under strong genomic selection.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Estimation of heritabilities and genetic correlations by time slices using predictivity in large genomic models.Genetics · 2025Article
- Estimation of ryegrass (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Changes in allele frequencies and genetic architecture due to selection in two pig populations.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Simulation of functional additive and non-additive genetic effects using statistical estimates from quantitative genetic models.Heredity · 2024Article
- Article
- The long-term effects of genomic selection: 2. Changes in allele frequencies of causal loci and new mutations.Genetics · 2023Article
- Multibreed genomic prediction using summary statistics and a breed-origin-of-alleles approach.Heredity · 2023Article
- Predicting the impact of genotype-by-genotype interaction on the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation from phenotype and genotype marker data of parental lines.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- The long-term effects of genomic selection: 1. Response to selection, additive genetic variance, and genetic architecture.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Functionally prioritised whole-genome sequence variants improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for heat tolerance.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- The correlation of substitution effects across populations and generations in the presence of nonadditive functional gene action.Genetics · 2021Article
- Predicting the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation from the genetic variance components in the parental lines.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Perspectives on Applications of Hierarchical Gene-To-Phenotype (G2P) Maps to Capture Non-stationary Effects of Alleles in Genomic Prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Current status of genomic evaluation.Journal of animal science · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Average effects of alleles can show considerable differences between populations. The magnitude of these differences can be measured by the additive genetic correlation between populations ([Formula: see text]). This [Formula: see text] can be lower than one due to the presence of non-additive genetic effects together with differences in allele frequencies between populations. However, the relationship between the nature of non-additive effects, differences in allele frequencies, and the value of [Formula: see text] remains unclear, and was therefore the focus of this study. We simulated genotype data of two populations that have diverged under drift only, or under drift and selection, and we simulated traits where the genetic model and magnitude of non-additive effects were varied. Results showed that larger differences in allele frequencies and larger non-additive effects resulted in lower values of [Formula: see text] In addition, we found that with epistasis, [Formula: see text] decreases with an increase of the number of interactions per locus. For both dominance and epistasis, we found that, when non-additive effects became extremely large, [Formula: see text] had a lower bound that was determined by the type of inter-allelic interaction, and the difference in allele frequencies between populations. Given that dominance variance is usually small, our results show that it is unlikely that true [Formula: see text] values lower than 0.80 are due to dominance effects alone. With realistic levels of epistasis, [Formula: see text] dropped as low as 0.45. These results may contribute to the understanding of differences in genetic expression of complex traits between populations, and may help in explaining the inefficiency of genomic trait prediction across populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.