Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31857137›Full record

ReviewHuman pathology2020

Immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms: what can brown do for you?

Andrew M Bellizzi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 209 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2021
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Scrotal hernia in a doguera baboon with diabetes mellitus.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Human Meningiomas Reveal No Evidence of Neuroendocrine Differentiation.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Differential diagnosis and predictive markers of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET).Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew M BellizziDepartment of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics and Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; University of Iowa Neuroendocrine Cancer Program, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics and Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: andrew-bellizzi@uiowa.edu.
University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Project 4: New Approaches to Improving the Effectiveness of Radionuclide Targeted Treatments in Neuroendocrine TumorsP50CA174521 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ODORISIO, THOMAS · 2015 to 2021
$13.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA174521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review is based on a presentation given at the Hans Popper Hepatopathology Society companion meeting at the 2019 United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology Annual Meeting. It presents updates on the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with an emphasis on the role of immunohistochemistry. Neuroendocrine neoplasms often present in liver biopsies as metastases of occult origin. Specific topics covered include 1. general features of neuroendocrine neoplasms, 2. general neuroendocrine marker immunohistochemistry, with discussion of the emerging marker INSM1, 3. non-small cell carcinoma with (occult) neuroendocrine differentiation, 4. the WHO Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with discussion of the 2019 classification of gastroenteropancreatic neoplasms, 5. use of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry, 6. immunohistochemistry to assign site of origin in neuroendocrine metastasis of occult origin, 7. immunohistochemistry to distinguish well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, 8. lesions frequently misdiagnosed as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, and 9. required and recommended data elements for biopsies and resections with associated immunohistochemical stains. Next-generation immunohistochemistry, including lineage-restricted transcription factors (e.g., CDX2, islet 1, OTP, SATB2) and protein correlates of molecular genetic events (e.g., p53, Rb), is indispensable for the accurate diagnosis and classification of these neoplasms.

Indexed as

ImmunohistochemistryBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansLiver NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma of Unknown PrimaryDifferential DiagnosisImmunohistochemistryINSM1Ki-67NeuroendocrineWorld Health Organization Classification

Identifiers

PMID31857137
PMCPMC7177196
OpenAlexW2996146831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.