Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31856900›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Comparative Effectiveness of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Mupirocin Ointment, and Normal Saline for the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-related Infections (COSMO-PD Trial): a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled protocol.

Surapon Nochaiwong, Chidchanok Ruengorn, Kajohnsak Noppakun, Setthapon Panyathong, Phongsak Dandecha, Manish M Sood, Chalermpong Saenjum, Ratanaporn Awiphan, Sasithorn Sirilun, Pajaree Mongkhon and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02547103 (Efficacy and Safety of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Mupirocin Ointment in the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02547103 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Local Application of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Mupirocin Ointment in the Prevention of Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infection: A Double-Blind, Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChiang Mai UniversityRan2016 to 2021Enrolled354ConditionsEnd Stage Renal Disease, Peritoneal DialysisArmsChlorhexidine gluconate-soaked cloths, Normal saline, mupirocin ointment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Peritoneal dialysis-related infections in elderly patients.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Surapon NochaiwongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. surapon.nochaiwong@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1100-7171
Chidchanok RuengornDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7927-1425
Kajohnsak NoppakunPharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Setthapon PanyathongPharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Phongsak DandechaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Manish M SoodOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Chalermpong SaenjumDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Ratanaporn AwiphanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Sasithorn SirilunDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Pajaree MongkhonPharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Wilaiwan ChongruksutPharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Kednapa ThavornPharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Thai Renal Outcomes Research (THOR) Investigators
Chiang Mai University · THUniversity of Ottawa · CANakornping Hospital · THPrince of Songkla University · THUniversity of Phayao · TH

Funding

Health Systems Research Institute (TH) 58-056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent international guidelines recommend the use of a daily topical exit-site antimicrobial to prevent peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related infections. Although nonantibiotic-based therapies are appealing because they may limit antimicrobial resistance, no controlled trials have been conducted to compare topical antimicrobial agents with usual exit-site care for the prevention of PD-related infections among the Thai PD population. We propose a controlled three-arm trial to examine the efficacy and safety of a daily chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated patch versus mupirocin ointment versus usual exit-site care with normal saline for the prevention of PD-related infections. METHODS/DESIGNS: This study is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, clinical trial. Adult patients aged 18 years or older who have end-stage kidney disease and are undergoing PD will be enrolled at three PD Centers in Thailand. A total of 354 PD patients will be randomly assigned to either the 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated patch, mupirocin ointment, or usual exit-site care with normal saline dressing according to a computer-generated random allocation sequence. Participants will be followed until discontinuation of PD or completion of 24 months. The primary study outcomes are time to first PD-related infection (exit-site/tunnel infection or peritonitis) event and the overall difference in PD-related infection rates between study arms. Secondary study outcomes will include (i) the rate of infection-related catheter removal and PD technique failure, (ii) rate of nasal and exit-site Staphylococcus aureus colonization, (iii) healthcare costs, and (iv) skin reactions and adverse events. We plan to conduct a cost-utility analysis alongside the trial from the perspectives of patients and society. A Markov simulation model will be used to estimate the total cost and health outcome in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 20-year time horizon. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in Thai Baht and U.S. dollars per QALYs gained will be illustrated. A series of probabilistic sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the cost-utility analysis findings. DISCUSSION: The results from this study will provide new clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence to support the best strategy for the prevention of PD-related infections among the Thai PD population.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02547103. Registered on September 11, 2015.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCatheter-Related InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingChlorhexidineClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisDouble-Blind MethodDrug CostsFemaleHumansIncidenceKidney Failure, ChronicAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconateMupirocinSaline SolutionChlorhexidine, Cost-utility, Infection, Mupirocin, Normal saline, Peritoneal dialysis, Prevention, Randomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31856900
PMCPMC6924023
OpenAlexW2994883086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.